• Treffer 13 von 36
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Human Rights Courts and Global Constitutionalism

  • International courts regularly cite each other, in part as a means of building legitimacy. Such international, cross-court use of precedent (or “judicial dialogue”) among the regional human rights courts and the Human Rights Committee has an additional purpose and effect: the construction of a rights-based global constitutionalism. Judicial dialogue among the human rights courts is purposeful in that the courts see themselves as embedded in, and contributing to, a global human rights legal system. Cross-citation among the human rights courts advances the construction of rights-based global constitutionalism in that it provides a basic degree of coordination among the regional courts. The jurisprudence of the U.N. Human Rights Committee (HRC), as an authoritative interpreter of core international human rights norms, plays the role of a central focal point for the decentralized coordination of jurisprudence. The network of regional courts and the HRC is building an emergent institutional structure for global rights-basedInternational courts regularly cite each other, in part as a means of building legitimacy. Such international, cross-court use of precedent (or “judicial dialogue”) among the regional human rights courts and the Human Rights Committee has an additional purpose and effect: the construction of a rights-based global constitutionalism. Judicial dialogue among the human rights courts is purposeful in that the courts see themselves as embedded in, and contributing to, a global human rights legal system. Cross-citation among the human rights courts advances the construction of rights-based global constitutionalism in that it provides a basic degree of coordination among the regional courts. The jurisprudence of the U.N. Human Rights Committee (HRC), as an authoritative interpreter of core international human rights norms, plays the role of a central focal point for the decentralized coordination of jurisprudence. The network of regional courts and the HRC is building an emergent institutional structure for global rights-based constitutionalism.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

  • kfg_wp35.pdfeng
    (1207KB)

    SHA-1: 3f138535d3f67e11f4388cdb541a29f1096bc869

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Wayne SandholtzGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-435831
DOI:https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-43583
Titel des übergeordneten Werks (Englisch):KFG Working Paper Series
Untertitel (Englisch):Coordination through Judicial Dialogue
Schriftenreihe (Bandnummer):KFG Working Paper Series (35)
Publikationstyp:Arbeitspapier
Sprache:Englisch
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:07.06.2019
Erscheinungsjahr:2019
Veröffentlichende Institution:Universität Potsdam
Datum der Freischaltung:24.10.2019
Ausgabe:35
Seitenanzahl:30
Quelle:First publication of the paper: SSRN https://ssrn.com/abstract=3394927
RVK - Regensburger Verbundklassifikation:PR 2411, MK 7900
Organisationseinheiten:Extern / Berlin Potsdam Research Group "The International Rule of Law - Rise or Decline?"
DDC-Klassifikation:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 34 Recht
Peer Review:Nicht referiert
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoKeine öffentliche Lizenz: Unter Urheberrechtsschutz
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.