• Treffer 2 von 20
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Dealing with large sample sizes: comparison of a new one spot dot blot method to western blot

  • Background: Western blot is the gold standard method to determine individual protein expression levels. However, western blot is technically difficult to perform in large sample sizes because it is a time consuming and labor intensive process. Dot blot is often used instead when dealing with large sample sizes, but the main disadvantage of the existing dot blot techniques, is the absence of signal normalization to a housekeeping protein. Methods: In this study we established a one dot two development signals (ODTDS) dot blot method employing two different signal development systems. The first signal from the protein of interest was detected by horseradish peroxidase (HRP). The second signal, detecting the housekeeping protein, was obtained by using alkaline phosphatase (AP). Results: Inter-assay results variations within ODTDS dot blot and western blot and intra-assay variations between both methods were low (1.04 - 5.71%) as assessed by coefficient of variation. Conclusions: ODTDS dot blot technique can be used instead of westernBackground: Western blot is the gold standard method to determine individual protein expression levels. However, western blot is technically difficult to perform in large sample sizes because it is a time consuming and labor intensive process. Dot blot is often used instead when dealing with large sample sizes, but the main disadvantage of the existing dot blot techniques, is the absence of signal normalization to a housekeeping protein. Methods: In this study we established a one dot two development signals (ODTDS) dot blot method employing two different signal development systems. The first signal from the protein of interest was detected by horseradish peroxidase (HRP). The second signal, detecting the housekeeping protein, was obtained by using alkaline phosphatase (AP). Results: Inter-assay results variations within ODTDS dot blot and western blot and intra-assay variations between both methods were low (1.04 - 5.71%) as assessed by coefficient of variation. Conclusions: ODTDS dot blot technique can be used instead of western blot when dealing with large sample sizes without a reduction in results accuracy.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Sulistyo Emantoko Dwi Putra, Oleg TsuprykovGND, Karoline Von WebskyORCiDGND, Teresa Ritter, Christoph ReichetzederORCiDGND, Berthold HocherORCiDGND
DOI:https://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2014.140317
ISSN:1433-6510
Pubmed ID:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25648029
Titel des übergeordneten Werks (Englisch):Clinical laboratory : the peer reviewed journal for clinical laboratories and laboratories related to blood transfusion
Verlag:Clin Lab Publ., Verl. Klinisches Labor
Verlagsort:Heidelberg
Publikationstyp:Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Sprache:Englisch
Jahr der Erstveröffentlichung:2014
Erscheinungsjahr:2014
Datum der Freischaltung:27.03.2017
Freies Schlagwort / Tag:comparison; large sample size studies; one dot two development signals (ODTDS) dot blot; protein quantification; western blot
Band:60
Ausgabe:11
Seitenanzahl:7
Erste Seite:1871
Letzte Seite:1877
Organisationseinheiten:Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Institut für Ernährungswissenschaft
Peer Review:Referiert
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.