• Treffer 1 von 1
Zurück zur Trefferliste

What happens when they think they are right?

  • Background: Comprehension of non-canonical sentences is frequently characterised by chance level performance in people with aphasia (PWA). Chance level performance has been interpreted as guessing, but online data does not support this rendering. It is still not clear whether the incorrect sentence processing is guided by the compensatory strategies that PWA might employ to overcome linguistic difficulties.Aims: We aim to study to what extent people with non-fluent aphasia are aware of their sentence comprehension deficits.Methods & Procedures: This study combined offline and online data to investigate the effect of word order and error-awareness on sentence comprehension in a group of PWA and non-brain damaged (NBD) participants. The offline tasks involved auditory sentence picture-matching immediately followed by a confidence rating (CR). Participants were asked to judge the perceived correctness of their previous answer. Online data consisted of eye-tracking.Outcomes & Results: Replicating previous findings, PWA had significantlyBackground: Comprehension of non-canonical sentences is frequently characterised by chance level performance in people with aphasia (PWA). Chance level performance has been interpreted as guessing, but online data does not support this rendering. It is still not clear whether the incorrect sentence processing is guided by the compensatory strategies that PWA might employ to overcome linguistic difficulties.Aims: We aim to study to what extent people with non-fluent aphasia are aware of their sentence comprehension deficits.Methods & Procedures: This study combined offline and online data to investigate the effect of word order and error-awareness on sentence comprehension in a group of PWA and non-brain damaged (NBD) participants. The offline tasks involved auditory sentence picture-matching immediately followed by a confidence rating (CR). Participants were asked to judge the perceived correctness of their previous answer. Online data consisted of eye-tracking.Outcomes & Results: Replicating previous findings, PWA had significantly worse comprehension of Theme-Agent order compared to Agent-Theme order sentences. Controls showed ceiling level sentence comprehension. CR was a poor predictor of response accuracy in PWA, but moderate-good in NBD. A total of 6.8% of judgements were classified as guessing by PWA. Post hoc gaze data analysis indicated that CR was a predictor of the fixation pattern during the presentation of the linguistic stimuli.Conclusions: Results suggest that PWA were mostly unaware of their sentence comprehension errors and did not consciously employ strategies to compensate for their difficulties.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Miren ArantzetaORCiD, Janet Webster, Itziar Laka, Maite Martinez-Zabaleta, David HowardORCiD
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2017.1423270
ISSN:0268-7038
ISSN:1464-5041
Titel des übergeordneten Werks (Englisch):Aphasiology : an international, interdisciplinary journal
Untertitel (Englisch):Error awareness analysis of sentence comprehension deficits in aphasia
Verlag:Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
Verlagsort:Abingdon
Publikationstyp:Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Sprache:Englisch
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:05.01.2018
Erscheinungsjahr:2018
Datum der Freischaltung:17.03.2022
Freies Schlagwort / Tag:Aphasia; anosognosia; error awareness; eye-tracking; sentence comprehension
Band:32
Ausgabe:12
Seitenanzahl:27
Erste Seite:1418
Letzte Seite:1444
Fördernde Institution:Erasmus Mundus Joint International Doctorate for Experimental Approaches to Language and Brain (IDEALAB) of the University of Groningen [2012-1713/001-001, 2012-0025]; Erasmus Mundus Joint International Doctorate for Experimental Approaches to Language and Brain (IDEALAB) of the University of Newcastle (UK) [2012-1713/001-001, 2012-0025]; Erasmus Mundus Joint International Doctorate for Experimental Approaches to Language and Brain (IDEALAB) of the University of Potsdam (DE) [2012-1713/001-001, 2012-0025]; Erasmus Mundus Joint International Doctorate for Experimental Approaches to Language and Brain (IDEALAB) of the University of Trento (IT) [2012-1713/001-001, 2012-0025]; Macquarie University, Sydney (AU) [2012-1713/001-001, 2012-0025]; Advancing the European Multilingual Experience (AThEME FP7) [613465]; Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [FFI2015-64183]; Basque GovernmentBasque Government [IT665-13]
Organisationseinheiten:Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Strukturbereich Kognitionswissenschaften / Department Linguistik
DDC-Klassifikation:4 Sprache / 41 Linguistik / 410 Linguistik
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoCC-BY-NC-ND - Namensnennung, nicht kommerziell, keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.