Availability, affect, and decisions to seek information about cancer risks
- How do people decide which risks they want to get informed about? The present study examines the role of the availability and affect heuristics on these decisions. Participants (N= 100, aged 19-72 years) selected for which of 23 cancers they would like to receive an information brochure, reported the number of occurrences of each type of cancer in their social circle (availability), and rated their dread reaction to each type of cancer (affect); they also made relative judgments about which of 2 cancers was more common in Germany (judged risk). Participants tended to choose information brochures for those cancers for which they indicated a higher availability within their social networks as well as for cancers they dreaded. Mediation analyses suggested that the influence of availability and affect on information choice was only partly mediated by judged risk. The results demonstrate the operation of 2 key judgment heuristics (availability and affect), previously studied in risk perception, also in decisions about information choice.How do people decide which risks they want to get informed about? The present study examines the role of the availability and affect heuristics on these decisions. Participants (N= 100, aged 19-72 years) selected for which of 23 cancers they would like to receive an information brochure, reported the number of occurrences of each type of cancer in their social circle (availability), and rated their dread reaction to each type of cancer (affect); they also made relative judgments about which of 2 cancers was more common in Germany (judged risk). Participants tended to choose information brochures for those cancers for which they indicated a higher availability within their social networks as well as for cancers they dreaded. Mediation analyses suggested that the influence of availability and affect on information choice was only partly mediated by judged risk. The results demonstrate the operation of 2 key judgment heuristics (availability and affect), previously studied in risk perception, also in decisions about information choice. We discuss how our findings can be used to identify which risks are likely to fall from people's radar.…
| Verfasserangaben: | Michelle McDowellORCiD, Thorsten PachurORCiDGND |
|---|---|
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20951775 |
| ISSN: | 0272-989X |
| ISSN: | 1552-681X |
| Pubmed ID: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32951508 |
| Titel des übergeordneten Werks (Englisch): | Medical decision making : MDM |
| Verlag: | Sage Publ. |
| Verlagsort: | Thousand Oaks |
| Publikationstyp: | Wissenschaftlicher Artikel |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Datum der Erstveröffentlichung: | 19.09.2020 |
| Erscheinungsjahr: | 2020 |
| Datum der Freischaltung: | 22.03.2023 |
| Freies Schlagwort / Tag: | information seeking; risk perception |
| Band: | 40 |
| Ausgabe: | 8 |
| Aufsatznummer: | 0272989X20951775 |
| Seitenanzahl: | 5 |
| Erste Seite: | 941 |
| Letzte Seite: | 945 |
| Fördernde Institution: | Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition, Max Planck Institute for; Human Development |
| Organisationseinheiten: | Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Strukturbereich Kognitionswissenschaften / Department Sport- und Gesundheitswissenschaften |
| DDC-Klassifikation: | 6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit |
| Peer Review: | Referiert |
