• Treffer 1 von 1
Zurück zur Trefferliste

The Pandora's Box of frailty assessments: Which is the best for clinical purposes in TAVI patients? A critical review

  • Frailty assessment is recommended before elective transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to determine post-interventional prognosis. Several studies have investigated frailty in TAVI-patients using numerous assessments; however, it remains unclear which is the most appropriate tool for clinical practice. Therefore, we evaluate which frailty assessment is mainly used and meaningful for ≤30-day and ≥1-year prognosis in TAVI patients. Randomized controlled or observational studies (prospective/retrospective) investigating all-cause mortality in older (≥70 years) TAVI patients were identified (PubMed; May 2020). In total, 79 studies investigating frailty with 49 different assessments were included. As single markers of frailty, mostly gait speed (23 studies) and serum albumin (16 studies) were used. Higher risk of 1-year mortality was predicted by slower gait speed (highest Hazard Ratios (HR): 14.71; 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.50–33.30) and lower serum albumin level (highest HR: 3.12; 95% CI 1.80–5.42). Composite indices (fiveFrailty assessment is recommended before elective transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to determine post-interventional prognosis. Several studies have investigated frailty in TAVI-patients using numerous assessments; however, it remains unclear which is the most appropriate tool for clinical practice. Therefore, we evaluate which frailty assessment is mainly used and meaningful for ≤30-day and ≥1-year prognosis in TAVI patients. Randomized controlled or observational studies (prospective/retrospective) investigating all-cause mortality in older (≥70 years) TAVI patients were identified (PubMed; May 2020). In total, 79 studies investigating frailty with 49 different assessments were included. As single markers of frailty, mostly gait speed (23 studies) and serum albumin (16 studies) were used. Higher risk of 1-year mortality was predicted by slower gait speed (highest Hazard Ratios (HR): 14.71; 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.50–33.30) and lower serum albumin level (highest HR: 3.12; 95% CI 1.80–5.42). Composite indices (five items; seven studies) were associated with 30-day (highest Odds Ratio (OR): 15.30; 95% CI 2.71–86.10) and 1-year mortality (highest OR: 2.75; 95% CI 1.55–4.87). In conclusion, single markers of frailty, in particular gait speed, were widely used to predict 1-year mortality. Composite indices were appropriate, as well as a comprehensive assessment of frailty. View Full-Textzeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

  • phr765.pdfeng
    (798KB)

    SHA-512:00429bb3dcabc39ba5cc1bcbcdc24c73f4becf2de5064496dc213366ca99aba5b1752733be1ab0496a79e37de375e2d396d18a3a40fed0dc368869c86db37829

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Omar BaritelloORCiD, Annett SalzwedelORCiDGND, Simon SündermannORCiDGND, Josef NiebauerORCiDGND, Heinz VöllerORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-550440
DOI:https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-55044
ISSN:1866-8364
Titel des übergeordneten Werks (Deutsch):Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe
Schriftenreihe (Bandnummer):Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe (765)
Verlag:Universitätsverlag Potsdam
Verlagsort:Potsdam
Sonstige beteiligte Person(en):Francesco Donatelli, Micha Maeder, Francesco Formica
Publikationstyp:Postprint
Sprache:Englisch
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:30.05.2022
Erscheinungsjahr:2021
Veröffentlichende Institution:Universität Potsdam
Titel verleihende Institution:Universität Potsdam
Datum der Freischaltung:30.05.2022
Freies Schlagwort / Tag:TAVI; cardiology; elderly; frailty tool; mortality; older patients
Band:10
Aufsatznummer:4506
Auflage:19
Seitenanzahl:17
Erste Seite:1
Letzte Seite:17
Organisationseinheiten:Fakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften
DDC-Klassifikation:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Peer Review:Referiert
Publikationsweg:Open Access / Green Open-Access
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoCC-BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International
Externe Anmerkung:Bibliographieeintrag der Originalveröffentlichung/Quelle
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.