• Treffer 1 von 1
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Do Start-Up Subsidies for the Unemployed Affect Participants’ Well-Being?

  • We estimate the long-term effects of start-up subsidies (SUS) for the unemployed on subjective outcome indicators of well-being, as measured by the participants’ satisfaction in different domains. This extends previous analyses of the current German SUS program (“Gründungszuschuss”) that focused on objective outcomes – such as employment and income – and allows us to make a more complete judgment about the overall effects of SUS at the individual level. This is especially important because subsidizing the transition into self-employment may have unintended adverse effects on participants’ well-being due to its risky nature and lower social security protection, especially in the long run. Having access to linked administrative-survey data providing us with rich information on pre-treatment characteristics, we base our analysis on the conditional independence assumption and use propensity score matching to estimate causal effects within the potential outcomes framework. We find long-term positive effects on job satisfaction but negativeWe estimate the long-term effects of start-up subsidies (SUS) for the unemployed on subjective outcome indicators of well-being, as measured by the participants’ satisfaction in different domains. This extends previous analyses of the current German SUS program (“Gründungszuschuss”) that focused on objective outcomes – such as employment and income – and allows us to make a more complete judgment about the overall effects of SUS at the individual level. This is especially important because subsidizing the transition into self-employment may have unintended adverse effects on participants’ well-being due to its risky nature and lower social security protection, especially in the long run. Having access to linked administrative-survey data providing us with rich information on pre-treatment characteristics, we base our analysis on the conditional independence assumption and use propensity score matching to estimate causal effects within the potential outcomes framework. We find long-term positive effects on job satisfaction but negative effects on individuals’ satisfaction with their social security situation. Further findings suggest that the negative effect on satisfaction with social security may be driven by negative effects on unemployment and retirement insurance coverage. Our heterogeneity analysis reveals substantial variation in effects across gender, age groups and skill levels. The sensitivity analyses show that these findings are highly robust.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

  • cepa14.pdfeng
    (789KB)

    SHA-1:fe55bb5c27382f3d63b8455b2f178827f6cfda16

Metadaten exportieren

Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Marco CaliendoORCiDGND, Stefan TübbickeGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-437468
DOI:https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-43746
ISSN:2628-653X
Titel des übergeordneten Werks (Englisch):CEPA Discussion Papers
Untertitel (Englisch):A Rigorous Look at (Un-)Intended Consequences of Labor Market Policies
Schriftenreihe (Bandnummer):CEPA Discussion Papers (14)
Publikationstyp:Arbeitspapier
Sprache:Englisch
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:14.11.2019
Erscheinungsjahr:2019
Veröffentlichende Institution:Universität Potsdam
Datum der Freischaltung:14.11.2019
Freies Schlagwort / Tag:Counterfactual Analysis; Propensity Score Matching; Start-Up Subsidies; Well-Being
Ausgabe:14
Seitenanzahl:47
RVK - Regensburger Verbundklassifikation:QP 230, QP 380, QP 710, QC 010
Organisationseinheiten:Zentrale und wissenschaftliche Einrichtungen / Center for Economic Policy Analysis (CEPA)
DDC-Klassifikation:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 33 Wirtschaft / 330 Wirtschaft
JEL-Klassifikation:C Mathematical and Quantitative Methods / C1 Econometric and Statistical Methods: General / C14 Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods
H Public Economics / H4 Publicly Provided Goods / H43 Project Evaluation; Social Discount Rate
I Health, Education, and Welfare / I3 Welfare and Poverty / I31 General Welfare
J Labor and Demographic Economics / J6 Mobility, Unemployment, and Vacancies / J68 Public Policy
L Industrial Organization / L2 Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior / L26 Entrepreneurship
Peer Review:Nicht referiert
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoKeine öffentliche Lizenz: Unter Urheberrechtsschutz
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.