• Treffer 58 von 114
Zurück zur Trefferliste

The assault on international adjudication and the limits of withdrawal

  • International adjudication is currently under assault, encouraging a number of States to withdraw, or to consider withdrawing, from treaties providing for international dispute settlement. This Working Paper argues that the act of treaty withdrawal is not merely as the unilateral executive exercise of the individual sovereign prerogative of a State. International law places checks upon the exercise of withdrawal, recognising that it is an act that of its nature affects the interests of other States parties, which have a collective interest in constraining withdrawal. National courts have a complementary function in restraining unilateral withdrawal in order to support the domestic constitution. The arguments advanced against international adjudication in the name of popular democracy at the national level can serve as a cloak for the exercise of executive power unrestrained by law. The submission by States of their disputes to peaceful settlement through international adjudication is central, not incidental, to the successfulInternational adjudication is currently under assault, encouraging a number of States to withdraw, or to consider withdrawing, from treaties providing for international dispute settlement. This Working Paper argues that the act of treaty withdrawal is not merely as the unilateral executive exercise of the individual sovereign prerogative of a State. International law places checks upon the exercise of withdrawal, recognising that it is an act that of its nature affects the interests of other States parties, which have a collective interest in constraining withdrawal. National courts have a complementary function in restraining unilateral withdrawal in order to support the domestic constitution. The arguments advanced against international adjudication in the name of popular democracy at the national level can serve as a cloak for the exercise of executive power unrestrained by law. The submission by States of their disputes to peaceful settlement through international adjudication is central, not incidental, to the successful operation of the international legal system.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

  • kfg_wp28.pdfeng
    (2163KB)

    SHA-1: fa1f171bf9b7d7d3ff4e755b649cb24ee7010fb1

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Campbell McLachlan
URN:urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-426855
DOI:https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-42685
Titel des übergeordneten Werks (Englisch):KFG Working Paper Series
Schriftenreihe (Bandnummer):KFG Working Paper Series (28)
Publikationstyp:Arbeitspapier
Sprache:Englisch
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:07.03.2019
Erscheinungsjahr:2019
Veröffentlichende Institution:Universität Potsdam
Datum der Freischaltung:28.03.2019
Ausgabe:28
Seitenanzahl:38
Quelle:First publication of the paper: SSRN https://ssrn.com/abstract=3335394
RVK - Regensburger Verbundklassifikation:PR 2207, PR 2566
Organisationseinheiten:Extern / Berlin Potsdam Research Group "The International Rule of Law - Rise or Decline?"
DDC-Klassifikation:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 34 Recht
Peer Review:Nicht referiert
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoKeine öffentliche Lizenz: Unter Urheberrechtsschutz
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.