Das Suchergebnis hat sich seit Ihrer Suchanfrage verändert. Eventuell werden Dokumente in anderer Reihenfolge angezeigt.
  • Treffer 12048 von 20664
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Question-answer test and givenness

  • In order to investigate the empirical properties of focus, it is necessary to diagnose focus (or: "what is focused") in particular linguistic examples. It is often taken for granted that the application of one single diagnostic tool, the so-called question-answer test, which roughly says that whatever a question asks for is focused in the answer, is a fool-proof test for focus. This paper investigates one example class where such uncritical belief in the question-answer test has led to the assumption of rather complex focus projection rules: in these examples, pitch accent placement has been claimed to depend on certain parts of the focused constituents being given or not. It is demonstrated that such focus projection rules are unnecessarily complex and in turn require the assumption of unnecessarily complicated meaning rules, not to speak of the difficulties to give a precise semantic/pragmatic definition of the allegedly involved givenness property. For the sake of the argument, an alternative analysis is put forward which reliesIn order to investigate the empirical properties of focus, it is necessary to diagnose focus (or: "what is focused") in particular linguistic examples. It is often taken for granted that the application of one single diagnostic tool, the so-called question-answer test, which roughly says that whatever a question asks for is focused in the answer, is a fool-proof test for focus. This paper investigates one example class where such uncritical belief in the question-answer test has led to the assumption of rather complex focus projection rules: in these examples, pitch accent placement has been claimed to depend on certain parts of the focused constituents being given or not. It is demonstrated that such focus projection rules are unnecessarily complex and in turn require the assumption of unnecessarily complicated meaning rules, not to speak of the difficulties to give a precise semantic/pragmatic definition of the allegedly involved givenness property. For the sake of the argument, an alternative analysis is put forward which relies solely on alternative sets following Mats Rooth's work, and avoids any recourse to givenness. As it turns out, this alternative analysis is not only simpler but also makes in a critical case the better predictions.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Elke Kasimir
URN:urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-8698
ISSN:1866-4725
ISSN:1614-4708
Titel des übergeordneten Werks (Deutsch):Interdisciplinary studies on information structure : ISIS ; working papers of the SFB 632
Untertitel (Deutsch):some question marks
Publikationstyp:Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Sprache:Englisch
Erscheinungsjahr:2005
Veröffentlichende Institution:Universität Potsdam
Beteiligte Körperschaft:Sonderforschungsbereich 632 Informationsstruktur <Potsdam>
Datum der Freischaltung:14.09.2006
Freies Schlagwort / Tag:focus; givenness
Ausgabe:3
Erste Seite:1
Letzte Seite:52
Quelle:Interdisciplinary studies on information structure : ISIS ; working papers of the SFB 632. - Vol. 3
RVK - Regensburger Verbundklassifikation:ER 300
Organisationseinheiten:Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Strukturbereich Kognitionswissenschaften / Department Linguistik
DDC-Klassifikation:4 Sprache / 40 Sprache / 400 Sprache
Sammlung(en):Universität Potsdam / Schriftenreihen / Interdisciplinary studies on information structure : ISIS ; working papers of the SFB 632, ISSN 1866-4725 / ISIS (2005) 03
Name der Einrichtung zum Zeitpunkt der Publikation:Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Institut für Linguistik / Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoKeine öffentliche Lizenz: Unter Urheberrechtsschutz
Externe Anmerkung:erschienen in:
Approaches and findings in oral, written and gestural language. - Potsdam : Univ.-Verl., 2005. - 244 S.
(Interdisciplinary studies on information structure ; 3)
ISBN 3-937786-01-5
URN: urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-8255

zugleich in Printform erschienen im Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.