• search hit 1 of 17
Back to Result List

Cross-Linguistic Differences in Processing Double-Embedded Relative Clauses: Working-Memory Constraints or Language Statistics?

  • An English double-embedded relative clause from which the middle verb is omitted can often be processed more easily than its grammatical counterpart, a phenomenon known as the grammaticality illusion. This effect has been found to be reversed in German, suggesting that the illusion is language specific rather than a consequence of universal working memory constraints. We present results from three self-paced reading experiments which show that Dutch native speakers also do not show the grammaticality illusion in Dutch, whereas both German and Dutch native speakers do show the illusion when reading English sentences. These findings provide evidence against working memory constraints as an explanation for the observed effect in English. We propose an alternative account based on the statistical patterns of the languages involved. In support of this alternative, a single recurrent neural network model that is trained on both Dutch and English sentences is shown to predict the cross-linguistic difference in the grammaticality effect.

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Stefan L. Frank, Thijs Trompenaars, Shravan VasishthORCiDGND
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12247
ISSN:0364-0213
ISSN:1551-6709
Pubmed ID:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25943302
Title of parent work (English):Cognitive science : a multidisciplinary journal of anthropology, artificial intelligence, education, linguistics, neuroscience, philosophy, psychology ; journal of the Cognitive Science Society
Publisher:Wiley-Blackwell
Place of publishing:Hoboken
Publication type:Article
Language:English
Year of first publication:2016
Publication year:2016
Release date:2020/03/22
Tag:Bilingualism; Centre embedding; Cross-linguistic differences; Grammaticality illusion; Recurrent neural network model; Relative clauses; Self-paced reading; Sentence comprehension
Volume:40
Number of pages:25
First page:554
Last Page:578
Funding institution:University of Potsdam; European Union [334028]
Peer review:Referiert
Institution name at the time of the publication:Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Exzellenzbereich Kognitionswissenschaften
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.