• Treffer 1 von 8
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Beyond Presidentialism and Parliamentarism

  • In a democracy, a constitutional separation of powers between the executive and the assembly may be desirable, but the constitutional concentration of executive power in a single human being is not. The book defends this thesis and explores ‘semi-parliamentary government’ as an alternative to presidential government. Semi-parliamentarism avoids power concentration in one person by shifting the separation of powers into the democratic assembly. The executive becomes fused with only one part of the assembly, even though the other part has at least equal democratic legitimacy and robust veto power on ordinary legislation. The book identifies the Australian Commonwealth and Japan, as well as the Australian states of New South Wales, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, and Western Australia, as semi-parliamentary systems. Using data from 23 countries and 6 Australian states, it maps how parliamentary and semi-parliamentary systems balance competing visions of democracy; it analyzes patterns of electoral and party systems, cabinetIn a democracy, a constitutional separation of powers between the executive and the assembly may be desirable, but the constitutional concentration of executive power in a single human being is not. The book defends this thesis and explores ‘semi-parliamentary government’ as an alternative to presidential government. Semi-parliamentarism avoids power concentration in one person by shifting the separation of powers into the democratic assembly. The executive becomes fused with only one part of the assembly, even though the other part has at least equal democratic legitimacy and robust veto power on ordinary legislation. The book identifies the Australian Commonwealth and Japan, as well as the Australian states of New South Wales, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, and Western Australia, as semi-parliamentary systems. Using data from 23 countries and 6 Australian states, it maps how parliamentary and semi-parliamentary systems balance competing visions of democracy; it analyzes patterns of electoral and party systems, cabinet formation, legislative coalition-building, and constitutional reforms; it systematically compares the semi-parliamentary and presidential separation of powers; and it develops new and innovative semi-parliamentary designs, some of which do not require two separate chambers.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

  • 194.pdfeng
    (2440KB)

    SHA-51246f15c13414c43bfe3006bd8f8b4fc1bf8880b9253ad136b00af8ffe515e1a6b80451be9010549fe85ddbbe1d9ed707da6859a5ae0a1272fdf84b73dba93a751

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Steffen GanghofORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-537839
DOI:https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-53783
ISBN:978-0-19-289714-5
ISSN:1867-5808
Titel des übergeordneten Werks (Deutsch):Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe
Untertitel (Englisch):Democratic Design and the Separation of Powers
Schriftenreihe (Bandnummer):Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe (194)
Publikationstyp:Postprint
Sprache:Englisch
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:17.12.2021
Erscheinungsjahr:2021
Veröffentlichende Institution:Universität Potsdam
Datum der Freischaltung:29.04.2024
Freies Schlagwort / Tag:Australia; bicameralism; constitutional design; democratic theory; executive personalism; parliamentary government; patterns of democracy; presidential government; semi-parliamentary government; separation of powers
Seitenanzahl:199
Quelle:Beyond Presidentialism and Parliamentarism: Democratic Design and the Separation of Powers (Oxford, 2021; online edn, Oxford Academic, 20 Jan. 2022), https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192897145.001.0001
Organisationseinheiten:Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Sozialwissenschaften / Fachgruppe Politik- & Verwaltungswissenschaft
DDC-Klassifikation:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 32 Politikwissenschaft / 320 Politikwissenschaft
Peer Review:Referiert
Publikationsweg:Open Access / Green Open-Access
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoCC-BY-NC-ND - Namensnennung, nicht kommerziell, keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International
Externe Anmerkung:Bibliographieeintrag der Originalveröffentlichung/Quelle
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.