• Treffer 5 von 69
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Typical intellectual engagement and achievement in math and the sciences in secondary education

  • Typical Intellectual Engagement (TIE) is considered a key trait in explaining individual differences in educational achievement in advanced academic or professional settings. Research in secondary education, however, has focused on cognitive and conative factors rather than personality. In the present large-scale study, we investigated the relation between TIE and achievement tests in math and science in Grade 9. A three-dimensional model (reading, contemplation, intellectual curiosity) provided high theoretical plausibility and satisfactory model fit. We quantified the predictive power of TIE with hierarchical regression models. After controlling for gender, migration background, and socioeconomic status, TIE contributed substantially to the explanation of math and science achievement. However, this effect almost disappeared after fluid intelligence and interest were added into the model. Thus, we found only limited support for the significance of TIE on educational achievement at least for subjects more strongly relying on fluidTypical Intellectual Engagement (TIE) is considered a key trait in explaining individual differences in educational achievement in advanced academic or professional settings. Research in secondary education, however, has focused on cognitive and conative factors rather than personality. In the present large-scale study, we investigated the relation between TIE and achievement tests in math and science in Grade 9. A three-dimensional model (reading, contemplation, intellectual curiosity) provided high theoretical plausibility and satisfactory model fit. We quantified the predictive power of TIE with hierarchical regression models. After controlling for gender, migration background, and socioeconomic status, TIE contributed substantially to the explanation of math and science achievement. However, this effect almost disappeared after fluid intelligence and interest were added into the model. Thus, we found only limited support for the significance of TIE on educational achievement at least for subjects more strongly relying on fluid abilities such as math and science. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Ulrich Schroeders, Stefan Schipolowski, Katrin BöhmeGND
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.030
ISSN:1041-6080
ISSN:1873-3425
Titel des übergeordneten Werks (Englisch):Learning and individual differences
Verlag:Elsevier
Verlagsort:Amsterdam
Publikationstyp:Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Sprache:Englisch
Jahr der Erstveröffentlichung:2015
Erscheinungsjahr:2015
Datum der Freischaltung:27.03.2017
Freies Schlagwort / Tag:Fluid intelligence; Math achievement; Science achievement; Subject-specific interest; Typical intellectual engagement
Band:43
Seitenanzahl:8
Erste Seite:31
Letzte Seite:38
Organisationseinheiten:Zentrale und wissenschaftliche Einrichtungen / Zentrum für Sprachen und Schlüsselkompetenzen (Zessko)
Peer Review:Referiert
Name der Einrichtung zum Zeitpunkt der Publikation:Zentrale und wissenschaftliche Einrichtungen / Sprachenzentrum
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.