100 Philosophie und Psychologie
Refine
Year of publication
- 2019 (22) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (11)
- Doctoral Thesis (5)
- Other (2)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (1)
- Part of a Book (1)
- Master's Thesis (1)
- Postprint (1)
Keywords
- Berühren (2)
- Eros (2)
- Kugelmenschen (2)
- Liebe (2)
- Philologie (2)
- Philosophical anthropology (2)
- Sokrates (2)
- Trinkgelage (2)
- Weisheit (2)
- Anthropologie (1)
Pride is linked to conviviality, to the practice of life-with-an-other, and to an awareness of the limitations of the life forms and life norms which guide and regulate the life of culturally, socially, and historically defined communities. Assuming this link, pride in living-together and conviviality appear as concepts creating a framework for future perspectives. But these concepts need a space in which they can unfold critically and confidently with a view to the future. For millennia, the literatures of the world have created this space of simulation and experimentation in which knowledge of how-to-live-with-an-other has been put down on paper through the open-ended tradition of writing. It is the space of the life forms and life norms of conviviality: it offers us prospective knowledge for the future by translating the imaginable into the thinkable, and the readable into the livable.
A central claim by Hoerl & McCormack is that the temporal reasoning system is uniquely human. But why exactly? This commentary evaluates two possible options to justify the thesis that temporal reasoning is uniquely human, one based on considerations regarding agency and the other based on language. The commentary raises problems for both of these options.
O caso Jauss
(2019)
This article aims to sum up the main results of a research project made in 2016 and 2017 about the situation of 1190 Romanian migrants in Western Europe and to give an overview about the push and pull factors, transnational family structures, as well as the challenges and difficulties of the Romanian survey respondents living in Germany, France, the United Kingdom and Italy. It also considers the role of personal networks which represent an important motor of migration and constitute the main motive for the choice of a certain destination region. These migration networks lead to the construction of transnational social spaces between Romania and the destination country and have high influence in the search for housing or jobs but can also influence the integration process abroad.
J. Dewey and H. Plessner both and independently of one another treated the central question of what new task philosophy must set itself if the assumption is correct that the life-form of mind, i.e., the mental life-form of humans, arose in nature and must also sustain itself in the future within nature. If nature has to reconceived so as to make the irreducible qualities of life and mind truly possible, then it can no longer be restricted to the role of physical material. Conversely humans cannot no longer take on the role of God outside and independent of nature. Instead these philosophers distinguish between three plateaus (Dewey) or stages (Plessner), between physical (inorganic) nature, psycho-physical (living) nature and the nature that is mental life. This distinction is drawn such that a connection between the plateaus is truly possible. The third level, that of the mental form of life, answers mentally within conduct to the break with the first two levels. Hence it depends in the future as well on the continuously renewed difference (between the precarious and the stable for Dewey, between immediacy and mediation for Plessner) in our experience of nature. Within this difference nature as a whole remains an open unknown, which is why we can credit Dewey with a philosophy of diversified and negative holism, Plessner with a differential philosophy of the negativity of the absolute.
Errata zu: Denken und Welt – Wege kritischer Metaphysik. dzph. Band 67, 2019, Heft 1, S. 76–97
(2019)
We begin by considering two common ways of conceiving critical metaphysics. According to the first (and polemical) conception, critical metaphysics analyzes nothing more than the form of thought and thereby misses the proper point of metaphysics, namely to investigate the form of reality. According to the second (and affirmative) conception, critical metaphysics starts from the supposed insight that the form of reality can’t be other than the form of thought and is thus not required to analyze anything but that form. We argue that the first conception is too weak while the second is too strong. Then we sketch an alternative conception of critical metaphysics, a conception we find expressed both in Kant’s B-Deduction and in the way Barry Stroud has recently investigated the possibility of metaphysics. According to such a conception, a properly critical metaphysics needs to proceed in two steps: first, it needs to analyze the most general and necessary form of any thought that is about an objective reality at all; second, it needs to investigate how that form of thought relates to the reality it purports to represent. But unlike Kant, Stroud remains sceptical regarding the possibility of a satisfying transition from thought to reality in metaphysics. We argue that this dissatisfaction can be traced back to a notion of objectivity and reality in terms of complete mind-independence. Then we sketch an alternative notion of objectivity and reality in terms of distinctness from subjects and acts of thinking, and argue that it is that notion that allows Kant, with his Transcendental Idealism, to make the transition required for any satisfying metaphysics, namely that from the form of thought to reality.
Der Artikel arbeitet an Platons Gastmahl ein semantisches Netz rund um das Konzept des ‚Berührens‘ heraus. Dabei bildet das Verb ἅπτομαι ein zentrales Relais, das zwischen dem vieldiskutierten ‚philosophischen Gehalt‘ des Textes und der in ihrem performativen Beitrag meist unterschätzten Rahmenhandlung vermittelt. Im Nachvollzug der Konstellationen des Berührens zeigt sich, dass dem Berühren, als Berühren, nicht begrifflich beizukommen ist – es entzieht sich dem aneignenden Zugriff. Berühren ist eben nicht Begriff. Deshalb muss sich das Gastmahl der Berührung auf andere Weise nähern, nämlich berührend – wofür die narratologische Konstruktion des Textes von entscheidender Wichtigkeit ist. Er praktiziert Philo-Logie, d.h. nutzt die Macht der Worte, die genau daraus entsteht, dass sie in einer sehr präzisen Weise zwischen den Beteiligten aus einer konstitutiven Distanz heraus wirken.
Freuds „Zeitgemässes über Krieg und Tod“ steht in doppelter Hinsicht im Zeichen der Zeit: Der Aufsatz ist nicht nur von der Kriegszeit geprägt, die 1915 den Schreibanlass liefert, sondern setzt sich auch inhaltlich intensiv mit Zeitlichkeit auseinander. Beides ist nicht voneinander zu trennen, weil es die aktuellen Erfahrungen sind, die den Bruch mit der vorherrschenden Vorstellung von Zeit und Historizität fordern: Vor dem Hintergrund des ersten Weltkrieges ist die Erzählung von Geschichte als Kultivierungsentwicklung, das heißt von fortschreitender Zeit unzeitgemäß. Als zeitgemäß erweist sich hingegen das psychoanalytische Modell, das Freud dem Kulturoptimismus substituiert. Es erlaubt, die regressive Aggression zu erklären, die sich in der Welt des frühen 20. Jahrhunderts Bahn bricht. Auf diese Weise verspricht die Psychoanalyse dem Forscher Freud den sicheren, wissenschaftlichen Boden unter den Füßen zurückzugewinnen, den er, vom „Wirbel dieser Kriegszeit gepackt“, zu Beginn als verloren beklagt. Dass dies gelingt, ist wiederum eine Frage der Zeit: Freud etabliert ein Modell von Zeitlichkeit, dem über die spezifisch psychoanalytische Dimension des Unbewussten ein zeitimmuner, a-temporaler Kern eingeschrieben ist, der den stürmischen Zeiten trotzt.