Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (33)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Other (33) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (33)
Keywords
- ISM: supernova remnants (2)
- errata, addenda (2)
- 7924 (1)
- 7934 (1)
- 7959 (1)
- CWSI (1)
- ISM: clouds (1)
- ISM: individual objects: G338.3-0.0 (1)
- Induced seismicity (1)
- Near infrared (1)
Institute
- Institut für Physik und Astronomie (8)
- Institut für Biochemie und Biologie (6)
- Department Psychologie (5)
- Institut für Geowissenschaften (4)
- Institut für Ernährungswissenschaft (3)
- Historisches Institut (2)
- Institut für Chemie (2)
- Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik (1)
- Institut für Informatik und Computational Science (1)
Various techniques are utilized by the seismological community, extractive industries, energy and geoengineering companies to identify earthquake nucleation processes in close proximity to engineering operation points. These operations may comprise fluid extraction or injections, artificial water reservoir impoundments, open pit and deep mining, deep geothermal power generations or carbon sequestration. In this letter to the editor, we outline several lines of investigation that we suggest to follow to address the discrimination problem between natural seismicity and seismic events induced or triggered by geoengineering activities. These suggestions have been developed by a group of experts during several meetings and workshops, and we feel that their publication as a summary report is helpful for the geoscientific community. Specific investigation procedures and discrimination approaches, on which our recommendations are based, are also published in this Special Issue (SI) of Journal of Seismology.
HESS J1640-465 - an exceptionally luminous TeV gamma-ray supernova remnant (vol 439, pg 2828, 2014)
(2014)
Gilbert et al. conclude that evidence from the Open Science Collaboration’s Reproducibility Project: Psychology indicates high reproducibility, given the study methodology. Their very optimistic assessment is limited by statistical misconceptions and by causal inferences from selectively interpreted, correlational data. Using the Reproducibility Project: Psychology data, both optimistic and pessimistic conclusions about reproducibility are possible, and neither are yet warranted.