Assessing Patient Preferences
- Despite the positive effects of including patients’ preferences into therapy on psychotherapy outcomes, there are still few thoroughly validated assessment tools at hand. We translated the 18-item Cooper-Norcross Inventory of Preferences (C-NIP) into German and aimed at replicating its factor structure. Further, we investigated the reliability of the questionnaire and its convergence with trait measures. A heterogeneous sample of N = 969 participants took part in our online survey. Performing ESEM models, we found acceptable model fit for a four-factor structure similar to the original factor structure. Furthermore, we propose an alternative model following the adjustment of single items. The German C-NIP showed acceptable to good reliability, as well as small correlations with Big-Five personality traits, trait and attachment anxiety, locus of control, and temporal focus. However, we recommend further replication of the factor structure and further validation of the C-NIP.
Author details: | Peter Eric HeinzeORCiDGND, Florian WeckORCiDGND, Franziska KühneORCiDGND |
---|---|
URN: | urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-544140 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-54414 |
ISSN: | 1866-8364 |
Title of parent work (German): | Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe |
Subtitle (English): | Examination of the German Cooper-Norcross Inventory of Preferences |
Publication series (Volume number): | Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe (753) |
Publication type: | Postprint |
Language: | English |
Date of first publication: | 2022/03/21 |
Publication year: | 2022 |
Publishing institution: | Universität Potsdam |
Release date: | 2022/03/21 |
Tag: | activity preference; preference; preference assessment; psychotherapy; validation study |
Article number: | 795776 |
Number of pages: | 12 |
Source: | Frontiers in Psychology 12 (2022) 795776 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.795776 |
Organizational units: | Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Strukturbereich Kognitionswissenschaften / Department Psychologie |
DDC classification: | 1 Philosophie und Psychologie / 15 Psychologie / 150 Psychologie |
Peer review: | Referiert |
Publishing method: | Open Access / Green Open-Access |
License (German): | CC-BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International |
External remark: | Bibliographieeintrag der Originalveröffentlichung/Quelle |
External remark: | Corrigendium*: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.854955/full |