Institut für Jüdische Theologie
Refine
Document Type
- Article (67)
- Part of a Book (41)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (12)
- Other (9)
- Review (9)
- Part of Periodical (7)
- Contribution to a Periodical (4)
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
- Master's Thesis (1)
- Postprint (1)
Keywords
- Judentum (4)
- Christentum (2)
- Ernährungsgewohnheit (2)
- Islam (2)
- Judaism (2)
- Jüdische Studien (2)
- Religiöses Leben (2)
- Speisegebot (2)
- dialogue (2)
- 18. Jahrhundert (1)
Institute
- Institut für Jüdische Theologie (153)
- Extern (9)
- Vereinigung für Jüdische Studien e. V. (4)
- Abraham Geiger Kolleg gGmbH (2)
- Institut für Ernährungswissenschaft (2)
- Institut für Jüdische Studien und Religionswissenschaft (2)
- Institut für Lebensgestaltung-Ethik-Religionskunde (2)
- MenschenRechtsZentrum (1)
Meeting the Romans
(2021)
According to the narrative of Acts, Saul is being introduced to the world of Rome in Cyprus by meeting the proconsul Sergius Paulus in Paphos. It is also here that for the first time his other name, Παῦλος (Paul), is mentioned and that the focus on his role in the Christ-movement for those from the nations moves to center stage. The Roman aspect of Saul/ Paul’s activities is developed from here on by the author of Acts, with numerous further encounters with Roman officials (e.g., Acts 21:37-39; 24:10-27; 25:6-12), to eventually culminate in Saul/Paul’s arrival and proclamation of the gospel with courage unhindered in Rome itself (Acts 28:31). I will argue in this chapter that in the narrative strategy of Acts, the events in Cyprus are presented as a crucial stepping stone on Paul’s way into the world of Rome and the spreading of the gospel to the center of political power.
Daniel Patte has taken many of us on a journey to reading Romans through history and cultures. Romans is the text to which faith communities have turned again and again to find guidance, comfort, and support in their struggles in times when the ground under their feet was shaking. It has been commented on, analyzed, cited, torn apart, and lived by over centuries by millions of people. Readings of Romans have had enormous impacts in history, constructive and destructive, well beyond what the one who wrote it could ever had imagined.
Ekkehard W. Stegemanns Lebenswerk hat einprägsame Spuren sowohl im wissenschaftlichen wie auch im öffentlichen Bereich hinterlassen. Es sind Spuren, die von hoch aktueller gegenwärtiger Bedeutung sind. Sein Wirken kann hier nur in kurzen Ansätzen gewürdigt werden und erfordert eine grundlegende zukünftige Aufarbeitung, um dessen Tragweite sichtbar werden zu lassen.
To affirm that Paul was a Jew did not emerge with the Paul within Judaism perspective, but only in recent decades have scholars begun not to evaluate this negatively over against Christianity. When the label »Paul within Judaism« appeared on the scene of scholarly research, it assembled under its umbrella a number of scholars who had argued over a significant period of time and from diverse angles that not only Paul himself but also his message should be seen as fully part of the range of Jewish traditions of the time. This has implications for all aspects of Pauline theologizing, including the key aspects of the assessment of time as messianic time, the role of scripture for ethnē in Christ, and God's faithfulness to his people Israel.
Paul addresses non-Jews in his letters thus his emphasis that ἔργα νόµου do not lead to δίκαιοσύνη is meant to clarify something for them. The phrase might well resonate with significant aspects of their former lives as pagans, when they worshipped their gods by performing rituals as required by deities, in order to be right with them. However, to perform a ritual in order to win the favor of the God of Israel would be a misunderstanding of God’s call, as this would base the relationship on works rather than grace. Non-Jews are called to orient their lives in Christ on the law in response to God’s grace, not to win his favor. Thus, Paul’s stance against ἔργα νόµου tries to address an issue of cultural misunderstanding for non-Jews in Christ, but Jewish Torah observance is not in view here at all. Thus ἔργα νόµου hardly played the decisive role in the parting of the ways.
Romans
(2022)
Although Paul is not very forthcoming with biographical details, his letter to the Romans does offer quite significant information about his self-perception, his role in the Christ movement, his understanding of his activities, the rationale and itinerary of his travels, and the network of people he knows in Rome. This information is found principally in the “framework” of the letter, that is, material at the beginning and toward the end, with the body consisting in its main content. However, clues about Paul himself are also interspersed throughout the body of the letter. In what follows, I will consider each of these clues within a series of thematic sections that arise from the biographical evidence in Romans.
Während langer Zeit war die Erforschung der jüdischen Traditionen der Zeit des Zweiten Tempels geprägt von der Perspektive christlicher Forscher, die diese als Vorläufer des Neuen Testaments, oder im Gegensatz dazu stehend verstanden.
Ansätze zu einer Veränderung entstanden in den 70er Jahren des 20. Jahrhunderts durch grundlegende Neuansätze im Verstehen jüdischer Traditionen in ihrer Eigenständigkeit, die Besetzung von entsprechenden Lehrstühlen durch jüdische Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler und die Förderung eines Wissenschaftsdiskurses auf Augenhöhe.
The process of secularization can be defined as a shift in the focus of European thought from the transcendent God, the otherworldly, and the suprahuman, towards immanence, that is, towards the world and the human condition in the world. Secularization represents a transition from theism to humanism. Given this definition, it is often concluded that secularization has led to the exclusion of God from thought and the removal of religion from society. Nevertheless, post-secular thought offers a more nuanced and sophisticated perspective. As postulated by numerous theorists, secularization was not a departure from theism and religion in general, but rather a departure from a specific conception of God and a particular mode of religiosity that had been dominant for an extended period. Most contributions to this volume identify the moments of secularization and humanism, not as the elimination of God but on the contrary as an opportunity that various thinkers recognized to liberate the divine from the constraints of hegemonic European theology and religiosity. This perspective suggests that secularization did not erase God but rather created an opportunity for the humanization of religion through ethical, social, or political activation. The papers in this volume take different approaches and offer different responses to the question of how the divine and the transcendent reappear in the discourse of humanism.
Für Schuld gibt es im Tanach keinen einheitlichen theologischen Begriff. Je nachdem ob von juristischer Haftbarkeit, sozialer Verantwortlichkeit oder kultischen Versäumnissen die Rede ist, kommen unterschiedliche Vokabeln zum Einsatz, die als Bestandteile eines komplexen biblischen Sündenkonzepts gelten können. Doch soll es im Folgenden nicht vorrangig um die Schuld des Menschen gegenüber Gott gehen und ebenso wenig um deren materielle Schuld untereinander.