Patent document collections are an immense source of knowledge for research and innovation communities worldwide. The rapid growth of the number of patent documents poses an enormous challenge for retrieving and analyzing information from this source in an effective manner. Based on deep learning methods for natural language processing, novel approaches have been developed in the field of patent analysis. The goal of these approaches is to reduce costs by automating tasks that previously only domain experts could solve. In this article, we provide a comprehensive survey of the application of deep learning for patent analysis. We summarize the state-of-the-art techniques and describe how they are applied to various tasks in the patent domain. In a detailed discussion, we categorize 40 papers based on the dataset, the representation, and the deep learning architecture that were used, as well as the patent analysis task that was targeted. With our survey, we aim to foster future research at the intersection of patent analysis and deep learning and we conclude by listing promising paths for future work.

In discrete manufacturing, the knowledge about causal relationships makes it possible to avoid unforeseen production downtimes by identifying their root causes. Learning causal structures from real-world settings remains challenging due to high-dimensional data, a mix of discrete and continuous variables, and requirements for preprocessing log data under the causal perspective. In our work, we address these challenges proposing a process for causal reasoning based on raw machine log data from production monitoring. Within this process, we define a set of transformation rules to extract independent and identically distributed observations. Further, we incorporate a variable selection step to handle high-dimensionality and a discretization step to include continuous variables. We enrich a commonly used causal structure learning algorithm with domain-related orientation rules, which provides a basis for causal reasoning. We demonstrate the process on a real-world dataset from a globally operating precision mechanical engineering company. The dataset contains over 40 million log data entries from production monitoring of a single machine. In this context, we determine the causal structures embedded in operational processes. Further, we examine causal effects to support machine operators in avoiding unforeseen production stops, i.e., by detaining machine operators from drawing false conclusions on impacting factors of unforeseen production stops based on experience.

The Security Operations Center (SOC) represents a specialized unit responsible for managing security within enterprises. To aid in its responsibilities, the SOC relies heavily on a Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) system that functions as a centralized repository for all security-related data, providing a comprehensive view of the organization's security posture. Due to the ability to offer such insights, SIEMS are considered indispensable tools facilitating SOC functions, such as monitoring, threat detection, and incident response. Despite advancements in big data architectures and analytics, most SIEMs fall short of keeping pace. Architecturally, they function merely as log search engines, lacking the support for distributed large-scale analytics. Analytically, they rely on rule-based correlation, neglecting the adoption of more advanced data science and machine learning techniques. This thesis first proposes a blueprint for next-generation SIEM systems that emphasize distributed processing and multi-layered storage to enable data mining at a big data scale. Next, with the architectural support, it introduces two data mining approaches for advanced threat detection as part of SOC operations. First, a novel graph mining technique that formulates threat detection within the SIEM system as a large-scale graph mining and inference problem, built on the principles of guilt-by-association and exempt-by-reputation. The approach entails the construction of a Heterogeneous Information Network (HIN) that models shared characteristics and associations among entities extracted from SIEM-related events/logs. Thereon, a novel graph-based inference algorithm is used to infer a node's maliciousness score based on its associations with other entities in the HIN. Second, an innovative outlier detection technique that imitates a SOC analyst's reasoning process to find anomalies/outliers. The approach emphasizes explainability and simplicity, achieved by combining the output of simple context-aware univariate submodels that calculate an outlier score for each entry. Both approaches were tested in academic and real-world settings, demonstrating high performance when compared to other algorithms as well as practicality alongside a large enterprise's SIEM system. This thesis establishes the foundation for next-generation SIEM systems that can enhance today's SOCs and facilitate the transition from human-centric to data-driven security operations.

Knowledge graphs are structured repositories of knowledge that store facts about the general world or a particular domain in terms of entities and their relationships. Owing to the heterogeneity of use cases that are served by them, there arises a need for the automated construction of domain- specific knowledge graphs from texts. While there have been many research efforts towards open information extraction for automated knowledge graph construction, these techniques do not perform well in domain-specific settings. Furthermore, regardless of whether they are constructed automatically from specific texts or based on real-world facts that are constantly evolving, all knowledge graphs inherently suffer from incompleteness as well as errors in the information they hold. This thesis investigates the challenges encountered during knowledge graph construction and proposes techniques for their curation (a.k.a. refinement) including the correction of semantic ambiguities and the completion of missing facts. Firstly, we leverage existing approaches for the automatic construction of a knowledge graph in the art domain with open information extraction techniques and analyse their limitations. In particular, we focus on the challenging task of named entity recognition for artwork titles and show empirical evidence of performance improvement with our proposed solution for the generation of annotated training data. Towards the curation of existing knowledge graphs, we identify the issue of polysemous relations that represent different semantics based on the context. Having concrete semantics for relations is important for downstream appli- cations (e.g. question answering) that are supported by knowledge graphs. Therefore, we define the novel task of finding fine-grained relation semantics in knowledge graphs and propose FineGReS, a data-driven technique that discovers potential sub-relations with fine-grained meaning from existing pol- ysemous relations. We leverage knowledge representation learning methods that generate low-dimensional vectors (or embeddings) for knowledge graphs to capture their semantics and structure. The efficacy and utility of the proposed technique are demonstrated by comparing it with several baselines on the entity classification use case. Further, we explore the semantic representations in knowledge graph embed- ding models. In the past decade, these models have shown state-of-the-art results for the task of link prediction in the context of knowledge graph comple- tion. In view of the popularity and widespread application of the embedding techniques not only for link prediction but also for different semantic tasks, this thesis presents a critical analysis of the embeddings by quantitatively measuring their semantic capabilities. We investigate and discuss the reasons for the shortcomings of embeddings in terms of the characteristics of the underlying knowledge graph datasets and the training techniques used by popular models. Following up on this, we propose ReasonKGE, a novel method for generating semantically enriched knowledge graph embeddings by taking into account the semantics of the facts that are encapsulated by an ontology accompanying the knowledge graph. With a targeted, reasoning-based method for generating negative samples during the training of the models, ReasonKGE is able to not only enhance the link prediction performance, but also reduce the number of semantically inconsistent predictions made by the resultant embeddings, thus improving the quality of knowledge graphs.

While supporting the execution of business processes, information systems record event logs. Conformance checking relies on these logs to analyze whether the recorded behavior of a process conforms to the behavior of a normative specification. A key assumption of existing conformance checking techniques, however, is that all events are associated with timestamps that allow to infer a total order of events per process instance. Unfortunately, this assumption is often violated in practice. Due to synchronization issues, manual event recordings, or data corruption, events are only partially ordered. In this paper, we put forward the problem of partial order resolution of event logs to close this gap. It refers to the construction of a probability distribution over all possible total orders of events of an instance. To cope with the order uncertainty in real-world data, we present several estimators for this task, incorporating different notions of behavioral abstraction. Moreover, to reduce the runtime of conformance checking based on partial order resolution, we introduce an approximation method that comes with a bounded error in terms of accuracy. Our experiments with real-world and synthetic data reveal that our approach improves accuracy over the state-of-the-art considerably.