• Deutsch

University Logo

  • Home
  • Search
  • Browse
  • Submit
  • Sitemap
Schließen

Refine

Has Fulltext

  • no (6)
  • yes (1)

Author

  • Geiss, Robin (4)
  • Geiß, Robin (3)
  • Siegrist, Michael (2)
  • Zimmermann, Andreas (2)

Year of publication

  • 2017 (1)
  • 2016 (1)
  • 2013 (3)
  • 2011 (2)

Document Type

  • Review (3)
  • Part of a Book (2)
  • Article (1)
  • Postprint (1)

Language

  • English (7)

Is part of the Bibliography

  • yes (7)

Institute

  • Öffentliches Recht (5)
  • Juristische Fakultät (1)
  • Wirtschaftswissenschaften (1)

7 search hits

  • 1 to 7
  • BibTeX
  • CSV
  • RIS
  • XML
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100

Sort by

  • Year
  • Year
  • Title
  • Title
  • Author
  • Author
Has the armed conflict in Afghanistan affected the rules on the conduct of hostilities? (2011)
Geiss, Robin ; Siegrist, Michael
The armed conflict in Afghanistan since 2001 has raised manifold questions pertaining to the humanitarian rules relative to the conduct of hostilities. In Afghanistan, as is often the case in so-called asymmetric conflicts, the geographical and temporal boundaries of the battlefield, and the distinction between civilians and fighters, are increasingly blurred. As a result, the risks for both civilians and soldiers operating in Afghanistan are high. The objective of this article is to assess whether - and if so how much - the armed conflict in Afghanistan has affected the application and interpretation of the principles of distinction, proportionality, and precaution - principles that form the core of legal rules pertaining to the conduct of hostilities.
Has the armed conflict in Afghanistan affected the rules on the conduct of hostilities? (2011)
Geiß, Robin ; Siegrist, Michael
The armed conflict in Afghanistan since 2001 has raised manifold questions pertaining to the humanitarian rules relative to the conduct of hostilities. In Afghanistan, as is often the case in so-called asymmetric conflicts, the geographical and temporal boundaries of the battlefield, and the distinction between civilians and fighters, are increasingly blurred. As a result, the risks for both civilians and soldiers operating in Afghanistan are high. The objective of this article is to assess whether - and if so how much - the armed conflict in Afghanistan has affected the application and interpretation of the principles of distinction, proportionality, and precaution - principles that form the core of legal rules pertaining to the conduct of hostilities.
Targeted killings law and morality in an asymmetrical world (2013)
Geiss, Robin
Targeted Killings and International Law (2013)
Geiss, Robin
The law of targeting (2013)
Geiss, Robin
The International Committee of the Red Cross: A Unique Actor in the Field of International Humanitarian Law Creation and Progressive Development (2017)
Zimmermann, Andreas ; Geiß, Robin
Article 8, VI, Article 8 para. 2 (f): scope of application of article 8 para. 2 (e) (2016)
Zimmermann, Andreas ; Geiß, Robin
  • 1 to 7

OPUS4 Logo  KOBV Logo  OAI Logo  DINI Zertifikat 2007  OA Netzwerk Logo

    • Publication server
    • University Bibliography
    • University Library
    • Policy
    • Contact
    • Imprint
    • Privacy Policy
    • Accessibility

    Login