Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (315) (remove)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (230)
- Part of a Book (42)
- Review (28)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (11)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Other (1)
- Part of Periodical (1)
Keywords
- Geschichte (3)
- evidentiality (3)
- Adverbs (2)
- Kongress (2)
- Linguistik (2)
- modal verbs (2)
- modality (2)
- pragmaticalisation (2)
- Córdoba (1)
- Diskontinuität (1)
The assumption of linguistics relativity and the definition of languages as epiphenomena are certainly known as two contradictory positions from the last century. But I will start my discussion of them in the period of their appearance and then use this as a basis to evaluate the heuristic value of these positions in present day linguistics. I will start with the definition of language as an epiphenomenon and then I will go on with the linguistic relativity.
The notion of ʽepiphenomenon’ is usually used to exclude certain aspects of a scientific object because they are considered to be deduced from others. In linguistics, restrictions of the research object were made, invoking the notion of ʽepiphenomenonʼ, which was partially done with a polemical attitude, and was always responded to polemically.
Definit oder indefinit?
(2018)
El centenario de la publicación del Curso de lingüística general (1916) de Saussure nos ha invitado a reexaminar la importancia de esta obra para instaurar una lingüística integrada en la semiología. Indudablemente la simplificación de las ideas de Saussure y la exageración de su concepto sistémico del lenguaje llevadas a cabo por los editores Bally y Sechehaye han contribuido a la acogida exitosa de la obra. En esta contribución, se propone, primero, introducir el concepto de ‘series de textos’, antes de analizar una serie “olvidada” y una nueva serie de obras por medio de las cuales se introdujeron conceptos semióticos en la época dominante de la lingüística histórica. En el análisis de estas dos series se pondrá el foco en el concepto de la arbitrariedad del signo.