Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (207)
- Postprint (14)
- Conference Proceeding (7)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (3)
- Review (2)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Part of Periodical (1)
- Preprint (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (236) (remove)
Keywords
- Eye movements (12)
- reading (12)
- eye movements (11)
- Reading (10)
- Chinese (9)
- perceptual span (5)
- preview benefit (5)
- Eye movement (4)
- Linear mixed model (4)
- individual differences (4)
Institute
- Department Psychologie (198)
- Department Linguistik (16)
- Strukturbereich Kognitionswissenschaften (10)
- Department Sport- und Gesundheitswissenschaften (6)
- Institut für Physik und Astronomie (5)
- Extern (3)
- Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät (3)
- Fakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften (2)
- Lehreinheit für Wirtschafts-Arbeit-Technik (2)
- Institut für Chemie (1)
- Institut für Mathematik (1)
- Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät (1)
- Verband für Patholinguistik e. V. (vpl) (1)
A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing
(2002)
We question the assumption of serial attention shifts and the assumption that saccade programs are initiated or canceled only after stage one of word identification. Evidence: (1) Fixation durations prior to skipped words are not consistently higher compared to those prior to non-skipped words. (2) Attentional modulation of microsaccade rate might occur after early visual processing. Saccades are probably triggered by attentional selection
Computational models such as E-Z Reader and SWIFT are ideal theoretical tools to test quantitatively our current understanding of eye-movement control in reading. Here we present a mathematical analysis of word skipping in the E-Z Reader model by semianalytic methods, to highlight the differences in current modeling approaches. In E-Z Reader, the word identification system must outperform the oculomotor system to induce word skipping. In SWIFT, there is competition among words to be selected as a saccade target. We conclude that it is the question of competitors in the "game" of word skipping that must be solved in eye movement research
SWIFT explorations
(2003)