Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (75)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (29)
- Review (10)
- Part of a Book (8)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Other (1)
- Postprint (1)
- Report (1)
Keywords
- Voluntary simplicity (3)
- collaborative consumption (3)
- sustainability (3)
- sustainable consumption (3)
- Collaborative consumption (2)
- Sustainability (2)
- anti-consumption (2)
- consciousness for fair consumption (2)
- consumer behavior (2)
- consumer education (2)
- consumer empowerment (2)
- consumption (2)
- expert interview (2)
- governance for sustainable development (2)
- innovation policy (2)
- social innovation (2)
- sufficiency (2)
- voluntary simplicity (2)
- well-being (2)
- Boycott (1)
- Buycott (1)
- Conjoint Analyse (1)
- Conjoint analysis (1)
- Consciousness for sustainable consumption (1)
- Consciousness regarding sustainable (1)
- Consumer Social Responsibility (1)
- Consumer decision-making (1)
- Consumer typology (1)
- Economically sustainable consumption (1)
- Einkauf (1)
- Environmental concerns (1)
- Fairtrade (1)
- Frugal consumption (1)
- Hedonism (1)
- Human values (1)
- Konsum (1)
- Konsum und Nachhaltigkeit (1)
- Konsumverhalten (1)
- Laddering interviews (1)
- Maßnahmen (1)
- Means-end chain analysis (1)
- Means-end chain theory (1)
- Naturparks (1)
- Psychologie (1)
- Purchasing panel data (1)
- Rebound-Effekte (1)
- Regionalentwicklung (1)
- Ressourcenverbrauch (1)
- Scale development (1)
- Social concerns (1)
- Strukturgleichungsmodelle (1)
- Suffizienz (1)
- Sustainable (1)
- Sustainable consumption (1)
- Tourismusmarketing (1)
- Verantwortung (1)
- Youth (1)
- Zahlungsbereitschaft (1)
- consume-less appeals (1)
- consumer social responsibility (1)
- consumer well-being (1)
- coronavirus pandemic (1)
- decision complexity (1)
- decision stages (1)
- donation behavior (1)
- double-hurdle model (1)
- emotional appeals (1)
- ethical consumerism (1)
- ethischer Konsum (1)
- expenditures (1)
- fair trade (1)
- faires Konsumbewusstsein (1)
- fairtrade (1)
- human values (1)
- income effects (1)
- indirect rebound effects (1)
- intervention study (1)
- materialism (1)
- moral licensing (1)
- nachhaltige Lebensstile (1)
- need for cognition (1)
- organic consumption (1)
- randomized trial (1)
- rebound effects (1)
- rebound-effect (1)
- scale development (1)
- shopping pattern (1)
- social marketing (1)
- social marketing social norms (1)
- socially conscious consumption (1)
- spending patterns (1)
- spillover effects (1)
- structural equation modeling (1)
- subjective well-being (1)
- substitution effects (1)
- voluntarily simplicity (1)
- willingness-to-pay (1)
Institute
Die ökologischen und sozialen Probleme der Gegenwart zwingen zu gravierenden Änderungen industrieller Produktions- und Wertschöpfungsprozesse und privater Konsumstile. Dieses Buch geht auf beide Seiten der Medaille ein: Es beleuchtet die Beiträge, die Unternehmen durch nachhaltiges Management für eine sozial gerechte und ökologische verträgliche Zukunftsentwicklung leisten können, als auch die Möglichkeiten der Konsumenten, durch ihre Konsumentscheidungen einen Beitrag zu einer lebenswerten Zukunft zu leisten. Jedes Kapitel wird durch eine Lernzielformulierung eingeleitet und durch eine Lernstandskontrolle abgeschlossen. Die zahlreichen Einblicke in die Praxis unterstützen das Verständnis. Aktuelle Links zu Websites von Unternehmen und Institutionen runden das Buch ab. Das Buch richtet sich insbesondere an Studierende der Wirtschaftswissenschaften, aber auch an Personen, die ein Interesse an dieser Themenstellung haben. Fazit: Die kompakte und verständliche Einführung schafft ein tieferes Verständnis für die Verknüpfung von nachhaltigem Management mit Konsumentenverhalten.
The organic market is characterized by remarkable disparities, and confusion persists about which motives drive organic consumption. To understand them, this research introduces the idea that the same consumer motives can exert different and potentially opposite impacts when organic consumption patterns unfold. The proposed multistage theory of differential effects distinguishes a participation stage, when consumers decide whether to purchase organic at all, and an expenditure stage, when consumers decide about how much of their budget to spend on organic products across purchases. An analysis of shopping patterns of approximately 14,000 households confirms the proposed differential influences: Other-oriented motives (care for others and the environment) support participation but impede sustained expenditures. Only self-oriented motives (hedonism) foster both participation and expenditures. The results pinpoint the need to rethink organic consumption as a stage-specific problem, which opens up new perspectives for managers about an old but persistent problem.
Welfare beyond consumption
(2020)
In developed regions worldwide, so-called anti-consumers are increasingly resisting high-level consumption lifestyles or shifting to alternative forms of consumption. A general reduction in consumption levels is considered necessary to attain global sustainability goals. However, knowledge regarding the factors driving people to deliberately consume less and how anti-consumption affects individuals' well-being is limited. Against this background, this study considers the influence of human values and the well-being effects of two types of anti-consumption: voluntary simplicity and collaborative consumption. Based on representative data from the US (N = 1075) and Germany (N = 1070), the findings show that the two anti-consumption types do not reduce the well-being of individuals' but in some cases, even improve it, which suggests that lowering consumption can not only help protect environmental resources but also serve the greater good of society. In particular, this relationship holds among collaborative consumers with a strong need for cognition, i.e., a cognitive thinking style that involves a high level of decision control. According to the study results, opposite value orientations are the drivers of voluntary simplicity and collaborative consumption (i.e., a focus on self-transcendence versus self-enhancement). These findings are comparable in both countries; however, the strength of the effects differs.
The coronavirus pandemic
(2022)
As a means to preserve present and future generations' living conditions, sustainable consumption presents a route to the enhanced well-being of individuals. However, the occurrence of the COVID-19 pandemic raises the question of whether society is going to continue down a path of increased awareness of sustainable consumption or whether the pandemic will move people to focus more on themselves. Based on data gathered before and near the end of the first pandemic lockdown in Germany in spring 2020, this research demonstrates that ecological, social, and voluntary simplicity consciousness deteriorated in the minds of sustainability-conscious consumers, with notable impacts on their willingness to spend sustainably and their shopping affinity. Furthermore, we identify segments that show particular vulnerability to the lockdown by reacting with a decrease in their ecological consumption consciousness. This study concludes with a discussion of the pandemic's implications for the spread of sustainable consumption styles and human well-being.
As overconsumption has negative effects on ecological balance, social equality, and individual well-being, reducing consumption levels among the materially affluent is an emerging strategy for sustainable development. Today's youth form a crucial target group for intervening in unsustainable overconsumption habits and for setting the path and ideas on responsible living. This article explores young people's motivations for engaging in three behavioural patterns linked to anti-consumption (voluntary simplicity, collaborative consumption, and living within one's means) in relation to sustainability. Applying a qualitative approach, laddering interviews reveal the consequences and values behind the anti-consumption behaviours of young people of ages 14 to 24 according to a means-end chains analysis. The findings highlight potential for and the challenges involved in motivating young people to reduce material levels of consumption for the sake of sustainability. Related consumer policy tools from the fields of education and communication are identified. This article provides practical implications for policy makers, activists, and educators. Consumer policies may strengthen anti-consumption among young people by addressing individual benefits, enabling reflection on personal values, and referencing credible narratives. The presented insights can help give a voice to young consumers, who struggle to establish themselves as key players in shaping the future consumption regime.
To purchase or not?
(2017)
Although ecologically and socially responsible consumption helps to reduce the harmful effects of resource use for both nature and society, all types of consumption (whether green or fair) deplete valuable resources. At the same time, to maintain household financial sustainability, spending should not exceed a household's financial resources. Thus, economically sustainable consumption is related to the consumer's decision to not buy products and the disposition to forgo specific purchases. Based on a means-end chain approach, this study investigates consumer cognitive decision-making structures related to six distinct options for economically (non-)sustainable consumption. Whereas saving motives, waste concerns, and avoidance motivations support economically sustainable decisions, economically non-sustainable decision-making is directly linked to attaining overall life goals. By clustering respondents based on the elicited means-end chains, the study discloses four consumer groups with distinctive motivational structures. The study also reveals several obstacles to promoting economic sustainability, indicates methods to overcome such obstacles, and suggests avenues for future research.
There are two fundamental ways in which consumers can express their concerns and obligations for society through their consumption decisions: They can boycott companies that they deem to be irresponsible or they may deliberately buy from companies that they perceive to act responsibly (‘buycott’). It has been largely ignored that individuals are driven by different motivational mechanisms to join boycotts and buycotts (punishment vs. reward of corporate behaviors), and thus, these mechanisms have disparate implications for the participating individual (e.g., high vs. low subjective costs because of a restriction in consumption habits). This paper fills this void and develops a framework suggesting that the extent to which consumers translate their concerns and obligations for society into a willingness to boycott and/or buycott is bounded by self-interest. Using a unique, representative sample of 1833 German consumers, this study reveals that the effects of environmental concerns and universalism on buycotting are amplified by hedonism, while the effects of social concern on buycotting and boycotting are attenuated by hedonism and simplicity, respectively. These results have far-reaching implications for organizations and policy planners who aim to change corporate behavior.
Responding to the global call for a "sustainable economy" requires meaningful insights into sustainability-conscious consumers and their actual buying behaviors. Sustainable consumption is not an all-or-nothing phenomenon because it encompasses several distinct behavioral patterns and consumption types. Therefore, companies are well advised to recognize multiple types of sustainability-conscious consumers with different expectations, attitudes, and values and to implement targeting strategies that do not rest on the assumption of homogeneity. Thus, the objective of this study is to provide a more fine-grained picture of (un)sustainable consumer segments and their differentiated effects in different product markets. Based on three large datasets, we create a robust six-segment typology of consumer consciousness regarding sustainable consumption. By using panel data on actual purchases, the results show not only that sustainability concerns significantly positively influence actual sustainable purchases, as expected, but also that sustainable buying can occur independently of sustainability concerns.
Anti-Consumption
(2019)
Transcending the conventional debate around efficiency in sustainable consumption, anti-consumption patterns leading to decreased levels of material consumption have been gaining importance. Change agents are crucial for the promotion of such patterns, so there may be lessons for governance interventions that can be learnt from the every-day experiences of those who actively implement and promote sustainability in the field of anti-consumption. Eighteen social innovation pioneers, who engage in and diffuse practices of voluntary simplicity and collaborative consumption as sustainable options of anti-consumption share their knowledge and personal insights in expert interviews for this research. Our qualitative content analysis reveals drivers, barriers, and governance strategies to strengthen anti-consumption patterns, which are negotiated between the market, the state, and civil society. Recommendations derived from the interviews concern entrepreneurship, municipal infrastructures in support of local grassroots projects, regulative policy measures, more positive communication to strengthen the visibility of initiatives and emphasize individual benefits, establishing a sense of community, anti-consumer activism, and education. We argue for complementary action between top-down strategies, bottom-up initiatives, corporate activities, and consumer behavior. The results are valuable to researchers, activists, marketers, and policymakers who seek to enhance their understanding of materially reduced consumption patterns based on the real-life experiences of active pioneers in the field.