Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (6) (remove)
Year of publication
- 2018 (6) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (6) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (6) (remove)
Keywords
- Alexander von Humboldt (2)
- 19. Jahrhundert (1)
- Archipelisches Denken (1)
- Evidentiality (1)
- Evidentialität (1)
- Gesteinsstudien (1)
- Humboldt brothers (1)
- Humboldtian science (1)
- Intersubjectivity (1)
- Intersubjektivität (1)
Institute
- Institut für Romanistik (6) (remove)
In this paper evidential and modal adverbs will be studied, such as French apparemment, évidemment, visiblement, Italian apparentemente, evidentemente, ovviamente, and Spanish aparentemente, evidentemente and visiblemente. The development of their signification will be discussed, including German adverbs like offensichtlich. In these means of expression, the functional-semantic categories evidentiality and epistemic modality seem to overlap: on the one hand, they are used if the state of affairs talked about cannot be verified, that is, if there is still a moment of insecurity concerning the transmitted information. Then adverbials with a special structure (preposition + article + nominal form of a verb) will be analysed, and we will examine if they behave in the same way.
Languages about Languages
(2018)
In the history of Humboldt research both brothers have been traditionally seen as representing the dichotomy between the humanities and the natural sciences. Today however, their similar approach to using and forming scientific language could be used as a starting point for conceiving a university, museum and even forum under one single Humboldtian science.
Während seiner Italienreise 1805 gelangte Humboldt erstmals nach Neapel, das mit dem Vesuv als idealer Ort für Studien über Vulkanismus und vulkanische Gesteine galt. Die Fragestellungen, die ihn ein Jahr nach seiner Amerikareise beschäftigten, lassen sich anhand von unveröffentlichten Texten (insbesondere aus seinem Italienischen Tagebuch) sowie von Objektbeispielen aus dem Museum für Naturkunde Berlin prüfen. In Neapel stand Humboldt in intensivem Gedankenaustausch mit Leopold von Buch. Dabei ging es vorrangig um eine Neuorientierung in der großen Wissenschaftsdebatte zwischen Neptunisten und Plutonisten. Diese Kontroverse prägte auch die Kontakte, die beide in Neapel zu Gelehrten und Sammlern aufbauten. Der wissenschaftshistorische Rahmen dieses Beitrags ist eine Rekonstruktion zeitgenössischer Kommunikationsformen, bei denen privaten Sammlungen eine wichtige Funktion für die Begegnung zwischen Forschern unterschiedlicher Provenienz und Orientierung zukam.
El manuscrito “Isle de Cube. Antilles en général” de Alejandro de Humboldt se puede comprender como el título para todo un archipiélago de textos. Su estructuración radicalmente abierta nos proporciona la idea de un modo de escribir y más aún de pensar de este explorador de cultura y naturaleza. Sus miniaturas textuales registran la complejidad política y social del mundo insular del Caribe de forma relacional y polilógica. En combinación con sus mapas cubanos y el Essai politique sur l’île de Cuba, este manuscrito hace de Humboldt un escritor prominente de la literatura cubana del siglo XIX.
This study adopts a cognitive approach to the analysis of the use of the Spanish imperfecto as a construal form for the conceptualization of state of affairs in certain journalistic texts. In doing so, the main focus of the study is to investigate cognitive processes like modalization and subjectivization, which are related to the speaker’s standpoint and to his subjective, not grammatically motivated, decision to use the imperfective instead of the perfective form. By the help of the corpus programmes GlossaNet and CREA (corpus of the Real Academia Española) we analyze the imperfective use of some Spanish verbs, which are semantically perfective in nature so that the normative use would require a perfective form. In other words, we investigate how the speaker/journalist construes a reality or situation to be expressed by means of the imperfecto and show that this use of the imperfect is typical for journalistic discourse.
The present paper discusses the relationship between evidentiality and (inter-) subjectivity and argues that the two semantic-functional categories need not be mutually exclusive. In the use of certain means of expression and in certain contexts, both evidentiality and (inter-) subjectivity may be conveyed simultaneously. I thereby differentiate between two meanings of intersubjectivity, namely ‘intersubjectivity1’ and ‘intersubjectivity2’. Intersubjectivity1 refers to the notion of common or general knowledge: certain means of expression are seen as being intersubjectively used when the speaker shares or assumes sharing knowledge with the interlocutor. Intersubjectivity2 is related to particular discourse functions of certain means of expression in interactional settings, paying attention to the speaker-hearer constellation.
In order to substantiate the theoretical part of the paper, I then present a qualitative analysis of Portuguese, Spanish and English examples, which are taken from the Corpus do Português, Corpus del Español and the Corpus of Contemporary American English.