Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (79) (remove)
Document Type
- Working Paper (79)
Language
- English (79)
Keywords
- experiment (12)
- communication (6)
- COVID-19 (4)
- Entrepreneurship (4)
- Innovation (4)
- cartel (4)
- entrepreneurship (4)
- gender (4)
- machine learning (4)
- E-DSGE (3)
- Start-Up Subsidies (3)
- air pollution (3)
- collusion (3)
- cooperation (3)
- mental health (3)
- Experiment (2)
- Human Capital Investment (2)
- Job Creation (2)
- Minimum Wage (2)
- Policy Reform (2)
- Productivity (2)
- R&D (2)
- Survival (2)
- Work-related Training (2)
- carbon pricing (2)
- climate policy (2)
- energy prices (2)
- gender pay gap (2)
- health (2)
- inequality (2)
- innovation (2)
- labor supply (2)
- linked employer-employee data (2)
- migration (2)
- population density (2)
- self-employment (2)
- strategic uncertainty (2)
- survival (2)
- welfare (2)
- Active Labor Market Policy (1)
- Africa (1)
- Ask avoidance (1)
- Backward ownership (1)
- Balancing weights (1)
- Business Grow (1)
- Carbon Capture (1)
- Carbon Dioxide Removal (1)
- Charitable giving (1)
- Climate Policy (1)
- Continuous Treatment (1)
- Counterfactual Analysis (1)
- Covid-19 (1)
- DiD (1)
- Difference-in-Differences (1)
- Earnings (1)
- Employee Training (1)
- Employment (1)
- Entry deterrence (1)
- Environmental Policy (1)
- Evaluation (1)
- Firm Growth (1)
- Foreclosure (1)
- Gender Wage Gap (1)
- High growth firms (1)
- Human Capital Investments (1)
- Impermanence (1)
- Inequality (1)
- Institutions (1)
- Instrumental Variables (1)
- Intertemporal Choice (1)
- Job Satisfaction (1)
- Job Search (1)
- Labor Market Mobility (1)
- Language (1)
- Large firms (1)
- Linguistic Saving Hypothesis (1)
- Long-term Crisis (1)
- MSMEs (1)
- Macroeconomic Dynamics (1)
- Manager Decisions (1)
- Matching (1)
- Minority shareholdings (1)
- Monte-Carlo simulation (1)
- Observational studies (1)
- PHQ-4 score (1)
- Partial ownership (1)
- Persistence (1)
- Policy Design (1)
- Propensity Score Matching (1)
- Push and Pull Theories (1)
- Quality of regional governments (1)
- Regional Bite (1)
- Regions (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Repeated request (1)
- Risk Attitudes (1)
- Risk Preferences (1)
- Search Frictions (1)
- Service Sector (1)
- Small firms (1)
- Social Cost of Carbon (1)
- Start-up Motivation (1)
- Start-up Subsidies (1)
- Start-ups (1)
- Ultimatum Game (1)
- Uniform pricing (1)
- Unintended Consequence (1)
- Vertical integration (1)
- Well-Being (1)
- Working Hours (1)
- accidents (1)
- alcohol consumption (1)
- ambiguity attitudes (1)
- behavioral economics (1)
- beliefs (1)
- blended learning (1)
- board diversity (1)
- business expansion (1)
- business services (1)
- business venturing (1)
- buyer behavior (1)
- carbon debt (1)
- carbon emissions (1)
- carbon price (1)
- carbon removal (1)
- cardiovascular disease (1)
- career costs of children (1)
- child care (1)
- childcare provision (1)
- climate (1)
- climate change (1)
- commuting (1)
- compliance behavior (1)
- congestion (1)
- corporate leniency program (1)
- crowding out (1)
- cycling (1)
- decomposition (1)
- decomposition methods (1)
- deliberate ignorance (1)
- depression (1)
- developing country cities (1)
- dictator game (1)
- discrete choice (1)
- discrimination (1)
- divergent thinking (1)
- double dividend (1)
- drugs (1)
- dynamic binary choice (1)
- dynamic panel estimation (1)
- efficiency (1)
- emergency-aid (1)
- emotion regulation (1)
- employer (1)
- employment (1)
- employment growth (1)
- endogenous growth (1)
- energy expenditure (1)
- energy policy (1)
- entrepreneurial performance (1)
- entrepreneurship policy (1)
- environment (1)
- environmental tax reform (1)
- envy (1)
- equity crowdfunding (1)
- extensive margin (1)
- finance (1)
- financial access and inclusion (1)
- firm growth (1)
- firm performance (1)
- fiscal policy (1)
- food prices (1)
- gambler’s fallac (1)
- gender wage gap (1)
- general self-efficacy (1)
- generalized difference-in-difference (1)
- gentrification (1)
- goal-setting (1)
- gratitude (1)
- gridded data (1)
- habit formation (1)
- hate crime (1)
- health behavior (1)
- high-dimensional fixed effects (1)
- home office (1)
- horizontal equity (1)
- horizontal innovation (1)
- hot hand fallacy (1)
- hours restrictions (1)
- housing market (1)
- human capital (1)
- incidental parameter bias correction (1)
- income (1)
- inequality of opportunity (1)
- infinitely repeated game (1)
- inflation (1)
- instrumental variables (1)
- involuntary unemployment (1)
- irrelevant information (1)
- job creation (1)
- judgment of communication (1)
- just transition (1)
- labor productivity (1)
- labour migration (1)
- leadership (1)
- locus of control (1)
- loss aversion (1)
- market-entry game (1)
- maternal employment (1)
- meta-analysis (1)
- military conflicts (1)
- mother’s labor supply (1)
- multi-valued treatment (1)
- natural field experiment (1)
- net-negative emissions (1)
- non-Ricardian households (1)
- obesity (1)
- objective health measures (1)
- parental leave (1)
- personality (1)
- physical activity (1)
- pollution (1)
- prescriptions (1)
- price competition (1)
- primary school (1)
- prisoners' dilemma (1)
- prisoner’s dilemma (1)
- productivity slowdown (1)
- promises (1)
- property taxes (1)
- public good (1)
- public transport (1)
- punishment (1)
- quantile regression (1)
- rebate and discount (1)
- reciprocity (1)
- redistribution (1)
- refugees (1)
- regulation of dominant firms (1)
- removal subsidies (1)
- renewable energy subsidies (1)
- rent control (1)
- representative longitudinal survey data (1)
- representative real-time survey data (1)
- resilience (1)
- retirement policies (1)
- returns to education (1)
- revenue recycling (1)
- risk attitudes (1)
- risk aversion (1)
- risk perception (1)
- sanctions (1)
- school health examinations (1)
- selection into employment (1)
- self-employed (1)
- sickness (1)
- social investment (1)
- soft information (1)
- spillover effects (1)
- stag-hunt game (1)
- stochastic uncertainty (1)
- strategic ignorance (1)
- strategic-uncertainty attitudes (1)
- subjective survival probability (1)
- sustainability (1)
- tax competition (1)
- taxpayer subsidies (1)
- terms-of-trade effects (1)
- text analysis (1)
- trade (1)
- trade policy (1)
- traffic (1)
- training (1)
- transport subsidies (1)
- treatment effects (1)
- two-way fixed effects (1)
- unemployment (1)
- unilateral climate policy (1)
- urban (1)
- vocational education (1)
- voting (1)
- voucher (1)
- wages (1)
- wars (1)
- wealth (1)
- windfall gains (1)
- women in management (1)
- women’s careers (1)
Institute
- Center for Economic Policy Analysis (CEPA) (79) (remove)
We study the effect of energy and transport policies on pollution in two developing country cities. We use a quantitative equilibrium model with choice of housing, energy use, residential location, transport mode, and energy technology. Pollution comes from commuting and residential energy use. The model parameters are calibrated to replicate key variables for two developing country cities, Maputo, Mozambique, and Yogyakarta, Indonesia. In the counterfactual simulations, we study how various transport and energy policies affect equilibrium pollution. Policies may be induce rebound effects from increasing residential energy use or switching to high emission modes or locations. In general, these rebound effects tend to be largest for subsidies to public transport or modern residential energy technology.
We analyze how conventional emissions trading schemes (ETS) can be modified by introducing “clean-up certificates” to allow for a phase of net-negative emissions. Clean-up certificates bundle the permission to emit CO2 with the obligation for its removal. We show that demand for such certificates is determined by cost-saving technological progress, the discount rate and the length of the compliance period. Introducing extra clean-up certificates into an existing ETS reduces near-term carbon prices and mitigation efforts. In contrast, substituting ETS allowances with clean-up certificates reduces cumulative emissions without depressing carbon prices or mitigation in the near term. We calibrate our model to the EU ETS and identify reforms where simultaneously (i) ambition levels rise, (ii) climate damages fall, (iii) revenues from carbon prices rise and (iv) carbon prices and aggregate mitigation cost fall. For reducing climate damages, roughly half of the issued clean-up certificates should replace conventional ETS allowances. In the context of the EU ETS, a European Carbon Central Bank could manage the implementation of cleanup certificates and could serve as an enforcement mechanism.
The self-employed faced strong income losses during the Covid-19 pandemic. Many governments introduced programs to financially support the self-employed during the pandemic, including Germany. The German Ministry for Economic Affairs announced a €50bn emergency-aid program in March 2020, offering one-off lump-sum payments of up to €15,000 to those facing substantial revenue declines. By reassuring the self- employed that the government ‘would not let them down’ during the crisis, the program had also the important aim of motivating the self-employed to get through the crisis. We investigate whether the program affected the confidence of the self-employed to survive the crisis using real-time online-survey data comprising more than 20,000 observations. We employ propensity score matching, making use of a rich set of variables that influence the subjective survival probability as main outcome measure. We observe that this program had significant effects, with the subjective survival probability of the self- employed being moderately increased. We reveal important effect heterogeneities with respect to education, industries, and speed of payment. Notably, positive effects only occur among those self-employed whose application was processed quickly. This suggests stress-induced waiting costs due to the uncertainty associated with the administrative processing and the overall pandemic situation. Our findings have policy implications for the design of support programs, while also contributing to the literature on the instruments and effects of entrepreneurship policy interventions in crisis situations.
Drinking is Different!
(2020)
Unhealthy behavior can be extremely costly from a micro- and macroeconomic perspective and exploring the determinants of such behavior is highly important from an economist’s point of view. We examine whether locus of control (LOC) can explain alcohol consumption as an important domain of health behavior. LOC measures how much an individual believes that she is in control of the consequences of her own actions for her life’s future outcomes. While earlier literature showed that an increasing internal LOC is associated with increased health-conscious behavior in domains such as smoking, exercise or diets, we find that drinking seems to be different. Using German panel data from the Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) we find a significant positive effect of having an internal LOC on the probability of moderate and regular drinking. We suggest and discuss two likely mechanisms for this relationship and find interesting gender differences. While social investments play an important role for both men and women, risk perceptions are especially relevant for men.
Expanding public or publicly subsidized childcare has been a top social policy priority in many industrialized countries. It is supposed to increase fertility, promote children’s development and enhance mothers’ labor market attachment. In this paper, we analyze the causal effect of one of the largest expansions of subsidized childcare for children up to three years among industrialized countries on the employment of mothers in Germany. Identification is based on spatial and temporal variation in the expansion of publicly subsidized childcare triggered by two comprehensive childcare policy reforms. The empirical analysis is based on the German Microcensus that is matched to county level data on childcare availability. Based on our preferred specification which includes time and county fixed effects we find that an increase in childcare slots by one percentage point increases mothers’ labor market participation rate by 0.2 percentage points. The overall increase in employment is explained by the rise in part-time employment with relatively long hours (20-35 hours per week). We do not find a change in full-time employment or lower part-time employment that is causally related to the childcare expansion. The effect is almost entirely driven by mothers with medium-level qualifications. Mothers with low education levels do not profit from this reform calling for a stronger policy focus on particularly disadvantaged groups in coming years.
We examine how the gender of business-owners is related to the wages paid to female relative to male employees working in their firms. Using Finnish register data and employing firm fixed effects, we find that the gender pay gap is – starting from a gender pay gap of 11 to 12 percent - two to three percentage-points lower for hourly wages in female-owned firms than in male-owned firms. Results are robust to how the wage is measured, as well as to various further robustness checks. More importantly, we find substantial differences between industries. While, for instance, in the manufacturing sector, the gender of the owner plays no role for the gender pay gap, in several service sector industries, like ICT or business services, no or a negligible gender pay gap can be found, but only when firms are led by female business owners. Businesses in male ownership maintain a gender pay gap of around 10 percent also in the latter industries. With increasing firm size, the influence of the gender of the owner, however, fades. In large firms, it seems that others – firm managers – determine wages and no differences in the pay gap are observed between male- and female-owned firms.
In this paper, we study one channel through which communication may facilitate cooperative behavior – belief precision. In a prisoner’s dilemma experiment, we show that communication not only makes individuals more optimistic that their partner will cooperate but also increases the precision of this belief, thereby reducing strategic uncertainty. To disentangle the shift in mean beliefs from the increase in precision, we elicit beliefs and precision in a two-stage procedure and in three situations: without communication, before communication, and after communication. We find that the precision of beliefs increases during communication.
We estimate the long-term effects of start-up subsidies (SUS) for the unemployed on subjective outcome indicators of well-being, as measured by the participants’ satisfaction in different domains. This extends previous analyses of the current German SUS program (“Gründungszuschuss”) that focused on objective outcomes – such as employment and income – and allows us to make a more complete judgment about the overall effects of SUS at the individual level. This is especially important because subsidizing the transition into self-employment may have unintended adverse effects on participants’ well-being due to its risky nature and lower social security protection, especially in the long run. Having access to linked administrative-survey data providing us with rich information on pre-treatment characteristics, we base our analysis on the conditional independence assumption and use propensity score matching to estimate causal effects within the potential outcomes framework. We find long-term positive effects on job satisfaction but negative effects on individuals’ satisfaction with their social security situation. Further findings suggest that the negative effect on satisfaction with social security may be driven by negative effects on unemployment and retirement insurance coverage. Our heterogeneity analysis reveals substantial variation in effects across gender, age groups and skill levels. The sensitivity analyses show that these findings are highly robust.
Envy is an unpleasant emotion. If individuals anticipate that comparing their payoff with the (potentially higher) payoff of others will make them envious, they may want to actively avoid information about other people’s payoffs. Given the opportunity to reduce another person’s payoff, an individual’s envy may trigger behavior that is detrimental to welfare. In this case, if individuals anticipate that they will react in a welfare-reducing way, they may also avoid information about other people’s payoffs from the outset. We investigated these two hypotheses using three experiments. We found that 13% of our potentially envious subjects avoided information when they did not have the opportunity to reduce another participant’s payoff. Psychological scales do not explain this behavior. We also found that voluntarily uninformed subjects did neither deduct less of the payoff nor less frequently than subjects who could not avoid the information.
Divergent thinking is the ability to produce numerous and diverse responses to questions or tasks, and it is used as a predictor of creative achievement. It plays a significant role in the business organization’s innovation process and the recognition of new business opportunities. Drawing upon the cumulative process model of creativity in entrepreneurship, we hypothesize that divergent thinking has a lasting effect on post-launch entrepreneurial outcomes related to innovation and growth, but that this relation might not always be linear. Additionally, we hypothesize that domain-specific experience has a moderating role in this relation. We test our hypotheses based on a representative longitudinal sample of 457 German business founders, which we observe up until 40 months after start-up. We find strong relative effects for innovation and growth outcomes. For survival we find conclusive evidence for non-linearities in the effects of divergent thinking. Additionally, we show that such effects are moderated by the type of domain-specific experience that entrepreneurs gathered pre-launch, as it shapes the individual’s ideational abilities to fit into more sophisticated strategies regarding entrepreneurial creative achievement. Our findings have relevant policy implications in characterizing and identifying business start-ups with growth and innovation potential, allowing a more efficient allocation of public and private funds.
In many countries, women are over-represented among low-wage employees, which is why a wage floor could benefit them particularly. Following this notion, we analyse the impact of the German minimum wage introduction in 2015 on the gender wage gap. Germany poses an interesting case study in this context, since it has a rather high gender wage gap and set the minimum wage at a relatively high level, affecting more than four million employees. Based on individual data from the Structure of Earnings Survey, containing information for over one million employees working in 60,000 firms, we use a difference-in- difference framework that exploits regional differences in the bite of the minimum wage. We find a significant negative effect of the minimum wage on the regional gender wage gap. Between 2014 and 2018, the gap at the 10th percentile of the wage distribution was reduced by 4.6 percentage points (or 32%) in regions that were strongly affected by the minimum wage compared to less affected regions. For the gap at the 25th percentile, the effect still amounted to -18%, while for the mean it was smaller (-11%) and not particularly robust. We thus find that the minimum wage can indeed reduce gender wage disparities. While the effect is highest for the low-paid, it also reaches up into higher parts of the wage distribution.
While a growing body of literature finds positive impacts of Start-Up Subsidies (SUS) on labor market outcomes of participants, little is known about how the design of these programs shapes their effectiveness and hence how to improve policy. As experimental variation in program design is unavailable, we exploit the 2011 reform of the current German SUS program for the unemployed which strengthened case-workers’ discretionary power, increased entry requirements and reduced monetary support. We estimate the impact of the reform on the program’s effectiveness using samples of participants and non-participants from before and after the reform. To control for time-constant unobserved heterogeneity as well as differential selection patterns based on observable characteristics over time, we combine Difference-in-Differences with inverse probability weighting using covariate balancing propensity scores. Holding participants’ observed characteristics as well as macroeconomic conditions constant, the results suggest that the reform was successful in raising employment effects on average. As these findings may be contaminated by changes in selection patterns based on unobserved characteristics, we assess our results using simulation-based sensitivity analyses and find that our estimates are highly robust to changes in unobserved characteristics. Hence, the reform most likely had a positive impact on the effectiveness of the program, suggesting that increasing entry requirements and reducing support in-creased the program’s impacts while reducing the cost per participant.
We investigate how the economic consequences of the pandemic, and of the government-mandated measures to contain its spread, affect the self-employed – particularly women – in Germany. For our analysis, we use representative, real-time survey data in which respondents were asked about their situation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings indicate that among the self-employed, who generally face a higher likelihood of income losses due to COVID-19 than employees, women are 35% more likely to experience income losses than their male counterparts. Conversely, we do not find a comparable gender gap among employees. Our results further suggest that the gender gap among the self-employed is largely explained by the fact that women disproportionately work in industries that are more severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Our analysis of potential mechanisms reveals that women are significantly more likely to be impacted by government-imposed restrictions, i.e. the regulation of opening hours. We conclude that future policy measures intending to mitigate the consequences of such shocks should account for this considerable variation in economic hardship.
While the economic harm of cartels is caused by their price-increasing effect, sanctioning by courts rather targets at the underlying process of firms reaching a price-fixing agreement. This paper provides experimental evidence on the question whether such sanctioning meets the economic target, i.e., whether evidence of a collusive meeting of the firms and of the content of their communication reliably predicts subsequent prices. We find that already the mere mutual agreement to meet predicts a strong increase in prices. Conversely, express distancing from communication completely nullifies its otherwise price-increasing effect. Using machine learning, we show that communication only increases prices if it is very explicit about how the cartel plans to behave.
Numerous studies investigate which sanctioning institutions prevent cartel formation but little is known as to how these sanctions work. We contribute to understanding the inner workings of cartels by studying experimentally the effect of sanctioning institutions on firms’ communication. Using machine learning to organize the chat communication into topics, we find that firms are significantly less likely to communicate explicitly about price fixing when sanctioning institutions are present. At the same time, average prices are lower when communication is less explicit. A mediation analysis suggests that sanctions are effective in hindering cartel formation not only because they introduce a risk of being fined but also by reducing the prevalence of explicit price communication.
From an active labor market policy perspective, start-up subsidies for unemployed individuals are very effective in improving long-term labor market outcomes for participants. From a business perspective, however, the assessment of these public programs is less clear since they might attract individuals with low entrepreneurial abilities and produce businesses with low survival rates and little contribution to job creation, economic growth, and innovation. In this paper, we use a rich data set to compare participants of a German start-up subsidy program for unemployed individuals to a group of regular founders who started from nonunemployment and did not receive the subsidy. The data allows us to analyze their business performance up until 40 months after business formation. We find that formerly subsidized founders lag behind not only in survival and job creation, but especially also in innovation activities. The gaps in these business outcomes are relatively constant or even widening over time. Hence, we do not see any indication of catching up in the longer run. While the gap in survival can be entirely explained by initial differences in observable start-up characteristics, the gap in business development remains and seems to be the result of restricted access to capital as well as differential business strategies and dynamics. Considering these conflicting results for the assessment of the subsidy program from an ALMP and business perspective, policy makers need to carefully weigh the costs and benefits of such a strategy to find the right policy mix.
Access to digital finance
(2024)
Financing entrepreneurship spurs innovation and economic growth. Digital financial platforms that crowdfund equity for entrepreneurs have emerged globally, yet they remain poorly understood. We model equity crowdfunding in terms of the relationship between the number of investors and the amount of money raised per pitch. We examine heterogeneity in the average amount raised per pitch that is associated with differences across three countries and seven platforms. Using a novel dataset of successful fundraising on the most prominent platforms in the UK, Germany, and the USA, we find the underlying relationship between the number of investors and the amount of money raised for entrepreneurs is loglinear, with a coefficient less than one and concave to the origin. We identify significant variation in the average amount invested in each pitch across countries and platforms. Our findings have implications for market actors as well as regulators who set competitive frameworks.
The large literature that aims to find evidence of climate migration delivers mixed findings. This meta-regression analysis i) summarizes direct links between adverse climatic events and migration, ii) maps patterns of climate migration, and iii) explains the variation in outcomes. Using a set of limited dependent variable models, we meta-analyze thus-far the most comprehensive sample of 3,625 estimates from 116 original studies and produce novel insights on climate migration. We find that extremely high temperatures and drying conditions increase migration. We do not find a significant effect of sudden-onset events. Climate migration is most likely to emerge due to contemporaneous events, to originate in rural areas and to take place in middle-income countries, internally, to cities. The likelihood to become trapped in affected areas is higher for women and in low-income countries, particularly in Africa. We uniquely quantify how pitfalls typical for the broader empirical climate impact literature affect climate migration findings. We also find evidence of different publication biases.
We use the prolonged Greek crisis as a case study to understand how a lasting economic shock affects the innovation strategies of firms in economies with moderate innovation activities. Adopting the 3-stage CDM model, we explore the link between R&D, innovation, and productivity for different size groups of Greek manufacturing firms during the prolonged crisis. At the first stage, we find that the continuation of the crisis is harmful for the R&D engagement of smaller firms while it increased the willingness for R&D activities among the larger ones. At the second stage, among smaller firms the knowledge production remains unaffected by R&D investments, while among larger firms the R&D decision is positively correlated with the probability of producing innovation, albeit the relationship is weakened as the crisis continues. At the third stage, innovation output benefits only larger firms in terms of labor productivity, while the innovation-productivity nexus is insignificant for smaller firms during the lasting crisis.