Refine
Year of publication
- 2024 (5)
- 2023 (7)
- 2022 (11)
- 2021 (10)
- 2020 (37)
- 2019 (156)
- 2018 (195)
- 2017 (117)
- 2016 (73)
- 2015 (18)
- 2014 (11)
- 2013 (17)
- 2012 (25)
- 2011 (21)
- 2010 (6)
- 2009 (7)
- 2008 (12)
- 2007 (11)
- 2006 (27)
- 2005 (17)
- 2004 (11)
- 2003 (4)
- 2002 (3)
- 2001 (2)
- 2000 (4)
- 1999 (2)
- 1998 (10)
- 1997 (5)
- 1996 (13)
- 1995 (9)
- 1994 (15)
- 1993 (4)
- 1992 (3)
- 1991 (1)
Document Type
- Other (870) (remove)
Language
- English (638)
- German (218)
- Spanish (5)
- Italian (3)
- Multiple languages (2)
- Polish (2)
- French (1)
- Portuguese (1)
Keywords
- Arrayseismologie (5)
- array seismology (5)
- Dysphagie (4)
- E-Learning (4)
- Erdbeben (4)
- Judaism (4)
- Judentum (4)
- MOOC (4)
- Patholinguistik (4)
- Schluckstörung (4)
Institute
- Institut für Biochemie und Biologie (85)
- Hasso-Plattner-Institut für Digital Engineering GmbH (83)
- Institut für Physik und Astronomie (82)
- Institut für Geowissenschaften (72)
- Institut für Mathematik (46)
- Department Psychologie (44)
- Department Sport- und Gesundheitswissenschaften (44)
- Institut für Ernährungswissenschaft (31)
- Hasso-Plattner-Institut für Digital Engineering gGmbH (30)
- Institut für Chemie (29)
Reply to Peng et al.: Archaeological contexts should not be ignored for early chicken domestication
(2015)
Charges dropped
(2015)
When local poverty is more important than your income: Mental health in minorities in inner cities
(2015)
Einführung in die Tagung
(2015)
Grußwort des Dekans
(2015)
Die Open Access-Strategie der Universität Potsdam verfolgt das Ziel, den offenen Zugang zu wissenschaftlichen Publikationen von Wissenschaftlern der Universität Potsdam nachhaltig zu fördern. Dazu werden sieben übergeordnete strategische Ziele definiert, aus denen in einem zweiten Schritt konkrete Handlungsfelder abgeleitet werden.
Die Strategie wurde am 16.12.2015 vom Senat der Universität Potsdam zustimmend zur Kenntnis genommen.
Conclusion
(2016)
This chapter revisits the role of the new modes of governance in areas of limited statehood. First, it states that there is no linear relationship between degrees of statehood and the overall effectiveness of new modes of sustainability governance. Second, the chapter states that, in most of the cases, national governments are hesitant or even actively hamper the development of new modes of governance. Third, it shows that the absence of the shadow of hierarchy can indeed lead to ineffective new modes of governance. However, the shadow of hierarchy does not necessarily need to be cast by states. Finally, the author reviews the complexities involved in participatory practices, stressing the importance of institutional structures and knowledgeable brokers. The chapter concludes by outlining fields for future research.
Introduction
(2016)
The Paris Agreement for Climate Change or the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) rely on new modes of governance for implementation. Indeed, new modes of governance such as market-based instruments, public-private partnerships or multi-stakeholder initiatives have been praised for playing a pivotal role in effective and legitimate sustainability governance. Yet, do they also deliver in areas of limited statehood? States such as Malaysia or the Dominican Republic partly lack the ability to implement and enforce rules; their statehood is limited. This introduction provides the analytical framework of this volume and critically examines the performance of new modes of governance in areas of limited statehood, drawing on the book’s in-depth case studies on issues of climate change, biodiversity, and health.