Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (35967)
- Doctoral Thesis (6517)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (5569)
- Postprint (3296)
- Review (2296)
- Part of a Book (1088)
- Other (966)
- Preprint (569)
- Conference Proceeding (561)
- Part of Periodical (531)
Language
- English (30966)
- German (26150)
- Spanish (363)
- French (330)
- Italian (115)
- Russian (113)
- Multiple languages (70)
- Hebrew (36)
- Portuguese (25)
- Polish (24)
Keywords
- Germany (207)
- climate change (182)
- Deutschland (145)
- machine learning (88)
- European Union (79)
- diffusion (78)
- Sprachtherapie (77)
- Migration (75)
- morphology (74)
- Logopädie (73)
Institute
- Institut für Biochemie und Biologie (5492)
- Institut für Physik und Astronomie (5457)
- Institut für Geowissenschaften (3673)
- Institut für Chemie (3485)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (2645)
- Historisches Institut (2524)
- Department Psychologie (2353)
- Institut für Mathematik (2152)
- Institut für Romanistik (2114)
- Sozialwissenschaften (1883)
German and European migration policy operates in permanent crisis mode. Sudden increases in irregular immigration create a sense of loss of control, which is instrumentalised by populist forces. This has generated great interest in quantitative migration predictions. High expectations are placed in the AI-based tools currently under devel­op­ment for forecasting irregular migration. The potential applications of these tools are manifold. They range from managing and strengthening the EU's reception capacity and border protections to configuring humanitarian aid provision and longer-term planning of development programmes. There is a significant gap between the expectations placed in the new instruments and their practical utility. Technical limits exist, medium-term forecasts are methodologically implausible, and channels for feeding the results into political decision-making processes are lacking. The great demand for predictions is driven by the political functions of migration prediction, which include its uses in political communication, funding acquisition and legitimisation of political decisions. Investment in the quality of the underlying data will be more productive than developing a succession of new prediction tools. Funding for applications in emergency relief and development cooperation should be prioritised. Crisis early warning and risk analysis should also be strengthened and their networking improved.