Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Preprint (260) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (260) (remove)
Keywords
- mental number line (4)
- numerical cognition (4)
- Cauchy problem (3)
- Fredholm property (3)
- index (3)
- reciprocal class (3)
- Brownian motion (2)
- Climate change (2)
- Dirac operator (2)
- Gibbs measure (2)
Institute
- Institut für Mathematik (95)
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Dynamik komplexer Systeme (26)
- Institut für Physik und Astronomie (24)
- Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik (20)
- Institut für Biochemie und Biologie (20)
- Department Psychologie (19)
- Institut für Geowissenschaften (17)
- Department Sport- und Gesundheitswissenschaften (8)
- Institut für Chemie (8)
- Extern (7)
Does working in a gender-atypical occupation reduce individuals’ likelihood of finding a different-sex romantic partner, and do such occupational partnership penalties contribute to occupational gender segregation? To answer this question, we theorized partnership penalties for working in gender-atypical occupations by drawing on insights from evolutionary psychology, social constructivism, and rational choice theory and exploited the stability of occupational pathways in Germany. In Study 1, we analyzed observational data from a national probability sample (N= 1,634,944) to assess whether individuals in gender-atypical occupations were less likely to be partnered than individuals who worked in gender typical occupations. To assess whether the observed partnership gaps found in Study 1 were causally related to the gender typicality of men’s and women’s occupations, we conducted a field experiment on a dating app (N = 6,778). Because the findings from Study 2 suggested that young women and men indeed experienced penalties for working in a gender-atypical occupation (at least when they were not highly attractive), we employed a choice-experimental design in Study 3 (N = 1,250) to assess whether women and men were aware of occupational partnership penalties and showed that anticipating occupational partnership penalties may keep young and highly educated women from working in gender-atypical occupations. Our main conclusion therefore is that that observed penalties and their anticipation seem to be driven by unconscious rather than conscious processes.