Refine
Year of publication
- 2011 (2047) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (1322)
- Doctoral Thesis (289)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (165)
- Review (96)
- Postprint (67)
- Conference Proceeding (29)
- Other (21)
- Master's Thesis (15)
- Part of Periodical (13)
- Preprint (9)
Language
Keywords
- Deutschland (17)
- Bürgerschaft (16)
- Germany (16)
- Integration (16)
- International Politics (16)
- Internationale Politik (16)
- Migration (16)
- Politische Theorie (16)
- Afghanistan (15)
- Friedens- und Konfliktforschung (14)
Institute
- Institut für Biochemie und Biologie (242)
- Institut für Physik und Astronomie (187)
- Institut für Chemie (176)
- Institut für Geowissenschaften (141)
- Institut für Romanistik (141)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (104)
- Department Psychologie (79)
- Sozialwissenschaften (73)
- MenschenRechtsZentrum (72)
- WeltTrends e.V. Potsdam (70)
Which repair strategy does the language system deploy when it gets garden-pathed, and what can regressive eye movements in reading tell us about reanalysis strategies? Several influential eye-tracking studies on syntactic reanalysis (Frazier & Rayner, 1982; Meseguer, Carreiras, & Clifton, 2002; Mitchell, Shen, Green, & Hodgson, 2008) have addressed this question by examining scanpaths, i.e., sequential patterns of eye fixations. However, in the absence of a suitable method for analyzing scanpaths, these studies relied on simplified dependent measures that are arguably ambiguous and hard to interpret. We address the theoretical question of repair strategy by developing a new method that quantifies scanpath similarity. Our method reveals several distinct fixation strategies associated with reanalysis that went undetected in a previously published data set (Meseguer et al., 2002). One prevalent pattern suggests re-parsing of the sentence, a strategy that has been discussed in the literature (Frazier & Rayner, 1982); however, readers differed tremendously in how they orchestrated the various fixation strategies. Our results suggest that the human parsing system non-deterministically adopts different strategies when confronted with the disambiguating material in garden-path sentences.