Refine
Document Type
- Article (22) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (22)
Keywords
- Academic self-concept (2)
- COVID-19 (2)
- Grundschule (2)
- Multilevel modeling (2)
- Teacher judgments (2)
- burnout (2)
- inclusion (2)
- pandemic (2)
- remote teaching (2)
- stress (2)
- Achievement emotions (1)
- Attention to classroom events (1)
- Austausch (1)
- Beanspruchungsfolgen (1)
- Beginning teachers (1)
- Big Five (1)
- Big Five personality traits (1)
- Classroom composition (1)
- Co-construction (1)
- Collaboration (1)
- Content analysis (1)
- Demands (1)
- Diagnostic Competency (1)
- Diagnostic skills (1)
- Differentiated Instruction (1)
- Empirische Wendung (1)
- Entwicklungsrisiken (1)
- Exchange (1)
- Förderbedarf (1)
- German (1)
- Giftedness (1)
- Grading (1)
- Heterogeneity of Abilities (1)
- Hilfebedarf für betroffene Familien (1)
- Hochbegabung (1)
- Inhaltsanalyse (1)
- Inklusion (1)
- Instructional quality (1)
- Journal analysis (1)
- K-12 teachers (1)
- Kokonstruktion (1)
- Kooperation (1)
- K−12 teachers (1)
- Lehrkräfte (1)
- Leistungsstarke Schüler*innen (1)
- ML (1)
- Mentoring (1)
- Model (1)
- Month of birth (1)
- NLP (1)
- Noticing (1)
- Peer (1)
- Praxissemester (1)
- Primary school (1)
- QuAIT model (1)
- QuAIT-Modell (1)
- Quality of instruction (1)
- Quantitative Textanalyse (1)
- Quantitative text analysis (1)
- Realistic Accuracy (1)
- Relative age effects (1)
- Science (1)
- Selbstwirksamkeitserwartungen (1)
- Self-efficacy (1)
- Special classes (1)
- Spezialklassen (1)
- Talented students (1)
- Teacher Professionalization (1)
- Teacher background (1)
- Teachers (1)
- Teaching Quality (1)
- Unterrichtsqualität (1)
- Wissenschaftsforschung (1)
- Zeitschriftenanalyse (1)
- adult children (1)
- attitude (1)
- attitudes (1)
- automatic evaluation (1)
- beliefs (1)
- conscientiousness (1)
- development risks (1)
- educational (1)
- educational achievement (1)
- erwachsene Kinder (1)
- explicit attitude (1)
- gemeinsamer Unterricht (1)
- gender (1)
- grade retention (1)
- grading practice (1)
- hatural language (1)
- implicit (1)
- implicit attitude (1)
- inclusive education (1)
- langfristige Auswirkungen (1)
- large-scale study (1)
- long-term effects (1)
- machine learning (1)
- mathematics (1)
- parents with mental illnesses (1)
- personality (1)
- preservice teacher (1)
- primary school (1)
- processing (1)
- psychisch kranke Eltern (1)
- reflection (1)
- relations (1)
- secondary school (1)
- social integration (1)
- socioeconomic status (1)
- soziale Integration (1)
- special educational needs (1)
- student personality (1)
- student teaching (1)
- studies (1)
- support for affected families (1)
- teacher judgements (1)
- teacher professional development (1)
- teacher-assigned grades (1)
- teacher‐ assigned grades (1)
- teaching (1)
Institute
- Department Erziehungswissenschaft (13)
- Strukturbereich Bildungswissenschaften (3)
- Zentrum für Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung (ZeLB) (3)
- Extern (2)
- Department Linguistik (1)
- Department Sport- und Gesundheitswissenschaften (1)
- Department für Inklusionspädagogik (1)
- Institut für Physik und Astronomie (1)
Teachers' attitudes toward inclusion are frequently cited as being an important predictor of how successfully a given inclusive school system is implemented. At the same time, beliefs about the nature of teaching and learning are discussed as a possible predictor of attitudes toward inclusion. However, more recent research emphasizes the need of considering implicit processes, such as automatic evaluations, when describing attitudes and beliefs. Previous evidence on the association of attitudes toward inclusion and beliefs about teaching and learning is solely based on explicit reports. Therefore, this study aims to examine the relationship between attitudes toward inclusion, beliefs about teaching and learning, and the subsequent automatic evaluations of pre-service teachers (N = 197). The results revealed differences between pre-service teachers' explicit attitudes/beliefs and their subsequent automatic evaluations. Differences in the relationship between attitudes toward inclusion and beliefs about teaching and learning occur when teachers focus either on explicit measures or automatic evaluations. These differences might be due to different facets of the same attitude object being represented. Relying solely on either explicit measures or automatic evaluations at the exclusion of the other might lead to erroneous assumptions about the relation of attitudes toward inclusion and beliefs about teaching and learning.