Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (27)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (27) (remove)
Language
- English (27)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (27)
Keywords
- SNARC (9)
- Mental number line (6)
- SNARC effect (5)
- mental arithmetic (5)
- operational momentum (5)
- Numerical cognition (4)
- Operational momentum (4)
- embodied cognition (4)
- numerical cognition (4)
- Mental arithmetic (3)
- mental number line (3)
- Cross-cultural (2)
- Pointing (2)
- Spatial bias (2)
- cognitive bias (2)
- hemispheric asymmetry (2)
- spatial-numerical associations (2)
- AHAB (1)
- Conceptual congruency effect (1)
- Counting (1)
- Counting direction (1)
- Distance effect (1)
- Embodied cognition (1)
- Go/no-go task (1)
- Heuristics (1)
- Heuristics and biases (1)
- IAT (1)
- Implicit association task (1)
- Magnitude comparison (1)
- Mental Number (1)
- Music cognition (1)
- Number-space association (1)
- Numerical (1)
- Operand order effect (1)
- Pitch (1)
- Preschool children (1)
- RNG (1)
- Reading (1)
- Reading direction (1)
- SMARC (1)
- Semantic (1)
- Situated cognition (1)
- Social co-representation (1)
- Sound recognition (1)
- Spatial cognition (1)
- Spatial-numerical association (1)
- Spatial-numerical association of response codes (1)
- Spatial-numerical association of response codes effect (1)
- Walking (1)
- addition (1)
- asymmetry (1)
- cognition (1)
- congruity effect (1)
- counting direction (1)
- effect (1)
- frequency tuning (1)
- global (1)
- heuristics and biases (1)
- local (1)
- magnitude association (1)
- mental number line (MNL) (1)
- negative numbers (1)
- newborns (1)
- problem solving (1)
- problem-solving (1)
- reading habits (1)
- spatial (1)
- spatial frequencies (1)
- spatial frequency (SF) (1)
- spatial vision (1)
- subtraction (1)
- temporal frequencies (1)
- temporal frequency (1)
- tie problems (1)
Institute
Reproducibility is a defining feature of science, but the extent to which it characterizes current research is unknown. We conducted replications of 100 experimental and correlational studies published in three psychology journals using high-powered designs and original materials when available. Replication effects were half the magnitude of original effects, representing a substantial decline. Ninety-seven percent of original studies had statistically significant results. Thirty-six percent of replications had statistically significant results; 47% of original effect sizes were in the 95% confidence interval of the replication effect size; 39% of effects were subjectively rated to have replicated the original result; and if no bias in original results is assumed, combining original and replication results left 68% with statistically significant effects. Correlational tests suggest that replication success was better predicted by the strength of original evidence than by characteristics of the original and replication teams.