800 Literatur und Rhetorik
Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (112) (remove)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (67)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (16)
- Part of a Book (12)
- Review (6)
- Doctoral Thesis (4)
- Habilitation Thesis (2)
- Other (2)
- Contribution to a Periodical (1)
- Moving Images (1)
- Journal/Publication series (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (112)
Keywords
- Berühren (4)
- Argumentationstheorie (3)
- Literatur (3)
- multilingualism (3)
- Anna Seghers (2)
- Aristoteles (2)
- Averroes (2)
- Berührung (2)
- Deutsche Literatur der Frühen Neuzeit (2)
- Drama (2)
Institute
- Institut für Germanistik (41)
- Institut für Künste und Medien (28)
- Institut für Romanistik (18)
- Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik (12)
- Klassische Philologie (5)
- Philosophische Fakultät (3)
- Historisches Institut (2)
- Department Linguistik (1)
- Institut für Jüdische Studien und Religionswissenschaft (1)
- Institut für Slavistik (1)
Language portraits are useful instruments to elicit speakers' reflections on the languages in their repertoires. In this study, we implement a "portrait-corpus approach" (Peters and Coetzee-Van Rooy 2020) to investigate the conceptualisations of the languages Afrikaans and English in 105 language portraits. In this approach, we use participants' reflections about their placement of the two languages on a human silhouette as a linguistic corpus. Relying on quantitative and qualitative analyses using WordSmith, Statistica and Atlas.ti, our study shows that Afrikaans is mainly conceptualised as a language that is located in more peripheral areas of the body (for example, the hands and feet) and, hence, is perceived as less important in participants' repertoires. The central location of English in the head reveals its status as an important language in the participants' multilingual repertoires. We argue that these conceptualisations of Afrikaans and English provide additional insight into the attitudes towards these languages in South Africa.
Against the pain
(2023)
Das Projekt beschäftigt sich mit der visuellen Wirkungsdimension von Lyrik und der Möglichkeit ihrer analytischen Beschreibung. Dafür werden die Anordnung von Versen und Wörtern, Auszeichnungen und andere typographische Strukturen von nicht experimentellen Gedichten seit Ende des 18. Jahrhunderts im Rahmen von Modellanalysen untersucht.
Literary criticism, particularly ecocriticism, occupies an uneasy position with regard to activism: reading books (or plays, or poems) seems like a rather leisurely activity to be undertaking if our environment—our planet—is in crisis. And yet, critiquing the narratives that structure worlds and discourses is key to the activities of the (literary) critic in this time of crisis. If this crisis manifests as a ‘crisis of imagination’ (e.g. Ghosh), I argue that this not so much a crisis of the absence of texts that address the environmental disaster, but rather a failure to comprehend the presences of the Anthropocene in the present. To interpret (literary) texts in this framework must entail acknowledging and scrutinising the extent of the incapacity of the privileged reader to comprehend the crisis as presence and present rather than spatially or temporally remote. The readings of the novels Carpentaria (2006) and The Swan Book (2013) by Waanyi writer Alexis Wright (Australia) trace the uneven presences of Anthropocenes in the present by way of bringing future worlds (The Swan Book) to the contemporary (Carpentaria). In both novels, protagonists must forge survival amongst ruins of the present and future: the depicted worlds, in particular the representations of the disenfranchisement of indigenous inhabitants of the far north of the Australian continent, emerge as a critique of the intersections of capitalist and colonial projects that define modernity and its impact on the global climate.