800 Literatur und Rhetorik
Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (17)
Document Type
- Article (17) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (17)
Keywords
- Berühren (2)
- Shakespeare (2)
- weather (2)
- Berührung (1)
- Carl Schmitt (1)
- Cressida (1)
- Denken (1)
- Differenzfeminismus (1)
- Diffraktionsmuster (1)
- Drama (1)
Institute
- Institut für Künste und Medien (17) (remove)
The article is dedicated to the problem of social bonds that is negotiated in Troilus and Cressida. Troilus and Ulysses embody an old, traditional order of the world that is out of joint, while Cressida's behaviour and her way of interacting indicate a different and new regime of social regulation that is about to take over. With its complex superposition of (touches of) love and war, Troilus and Cressida brings together rituals of touch, anarchic speech acts, and a gendered perspective on the world that associates touch and temporality with 'frail' femininity and temptation. With unrivalled intensity, the play puts to the spectator that the basic condition of touch, i.e. exposing oneself to another, entails an incalculable risk. Hector tragically falls for the vulnerability inherent in touch and the audience suffers with him because they share this existential precondition on which modern society is 'founded.' The gloomy, inescapable atmosphere of societal crisis that Troilus and Cressida creates emphasises the fact that the fragility of touch is not to be overcome. The fractions - no matter whether Greek, Trojan, or those of loving couples - cannot simply be reunited to form a new, authentic entity. Generating at least some form of social cohesion therefore remains a challenge.
On 7 February 1861, John Tyndall, professor of natural philosophy, delivered a historical lecture: he could prove that different gases absorb heat to a very different degree, which implies that the temperate conditions provided for by the Earth's atmosphere are dependent on its particular composition of gases. The theoretical foundation of climate science was laid.
Ten years later, on the other side of the Channel, a young and ambitious author was working on a comprehensive literary analysis of the French era under the Second Empire. Émile Zola had probably not heard or read of Tyndall's discovery. However, the article makes the case for reading Zola's Rougon-Macquart as an extensive story of climate change. Zola's literary attempts to capture the defining characteristic of the Second Empire led him to the insight that its various milieus were all part of the same ‘climate’: that of an all-encompassing warming. Zola suggests that this climate is man-made: the economic success of the Second Empire is based on heating, in a literal and metaphorical sense, as well as on stoking the steam-engines and creating the hypertrophic atmosphere of the hothouse that enhances life and maximises turnover and profit. In contrast to Tyndall and his audience, Zola sensed the catastrophic consequences of this warming: the Second Empire was inevitably moving towards a final débâcle, i.e. it was doomed to perish in local and ‘global’ climate catastrophes.
The article foregrounds the supplementary status of Tyndall's physical and Zola's literary knowledge. As Zola's striking intuition demonstrates, literature appears to have a privileged approach to the phenomenon of man-induced climate change.
Nichts (Luce Irigaray)
(2021)
Vorwort
(2021)
Was heißt Berühren Denken?
(2021)
The article is dedicated to the role of weather in Shakespeare’s tragedies. It traces a dense net of weather instances – stage weather, narrated weather events, weather imagery – throughout his plays, and attempts to reconstruct the weather’s structural implications for the tragedy genre. The way early modern humoral pathology understood the weather’s influence on the humours of the human body – of which Shakespeare’s plays themselves give evidence – provides the background for reconstructing the function of the weather as a source of tragic force. Its turbulence not only infects the characters in the play and thereby drives the plot, but also transgresses the boundaries of the fictional world and affects spectators in the auditorium.
„Now is the winter of our discontent | Made glorious summer by this son of York“ – mit diesen Worten öffnet Shakespeares Richard III. Ein einziger Schau- spieler hat die Bühne betreten, beginnt zu reden und setzt so, alleine, das Stück in Gang – ein Novum für Shakespeare. Die frühneuzeitliche Bühne ist (fast) leer, die Zuschauer*innen hängen an den Lippen des Protagonisten, um durch seine Worte in die fiktive Welt des Dramas eingeführt zu werden.
Gleich mit dem ersten Wort versetzt Richard die Zuschauer*innen in eine andere Gegenwart: Fast wie eine hypnotische Anweisung konstituiert dieses „Now“ das Zeit-Raum-Gefüge der englischen Rosenkriege. Sich diesem thea- tralen „Now“ hinzugeben ist die Aufgabe der Zuschauer*innen. Sie sind auf- gerufen, „to forget (however briefly) everything they have experienced before. What matters is this ‚now‘, the hic et nunc of the theatre.“
Ways of Worldmaking
(2020)