800 Literatur und Rhetorik
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (119)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (28)
- Postprint (26)
- Doctoral Thesis (18)
- Preprint (18)
- Part of a Book (11)
- Master's Thesis (6)
- Review (6)
- Bachelor Thesis (2)
- Contribution to a Periodical (1)
Keywords
- Argumentationstheorie (8)
- Frühe Neuzeit (6)
- Berühren (5)
- Humanismus (5)
- Literatur (5)
- Poetik (5)
- Aristoteles (4)
- Averroes (4)
- Deutsche Literatur der Frühen Neuzeit (4)
- Enthusiasmus (4)
Institute
- Institut für Germanistik (73)
- Institut für Slavistik (50)
- Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik (35)
- Institut für Künste und Medien (29)
- Institut für Romanistik (26)
- Klassische Philologie (5)
- Philosophische Fakultät (5)
- Sonderforschungsbereich 632 - Informationsstruktur (5)
- Department Linguistik (4)
- Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät (4)
Warum spricht der Papagei? Weiß er, was er sagt? Und warum ist sein Sprechen, das wie menschliche Rede klingt, und doch etwas ganz anderes ist, so irritierend? Dieser Irritation folgt Sula Textor durch die komplexe Geschichte des Papageis als Figur in Kunst und Literatur und entwirft dabei den Begriff des (narrativen) Psittazismus. In ihrer komparatistisch angelegten narratologischen Studie wird Sprechen selbst zum Thema – und die Stimme (im individuellen, politischen wie narratologischen Sinn) zum Problem. Sie hinterfragt nicht nur, was Sprechen ist und wem es möglich und erlaubt ist, sondern nimmt die Komplexität des Erzählens grundsätzlich in den Blick.
In 1735, the Leipzig professor of medicine Samuel Theodor Quellmaltz (1696–1758) designed and built an artificial horse. He presented it in an illustrated construction manual, which included precise information about the materials and dimensions of this wooden horse for therapeutic use. This contribution analyses Quellmaltz’s invention of the ‘machine horse’ as a medical and technological contribution to prevalent theories about the paradigmatic role of the machine in Enlightenment thought.
How did humans respond to the eighteenth-century discovery of countless new species of animals? This book explores the gamut of intense human-animal interactions: from love to cultural identifications, moral reflections, philosophical debates, classification systems, mechanical copies, insults and literary creativity.
Dogs, cats and horses, of course, play central roles. But this volume also features human reflections upon parrots, songbirds, monkeys, a rhino, an elephant, pigs, and geese – all the way through to the admired silkworms and the not-so-admired bookworms.
An exceptionally wide array of source materials are used in this volume’s ten separate contributions, plus the editorial introduction, to demonstrate this diversity. As eighteenth-century humans came to realise that they too are animals, they had to recast their relationships with their fellow living-beings on Planet Earth. And these considerations remain very much live ones to this day.
Theorie des (Un-)Praktischen
(2022)
De/lirios
(2023)
En base al concepto de "de/lirio", que articula trastornos en la enunciación literaria en primera persona, por un lado, con la caracterización psicopatológica de este yo enunciativo, por otro lado, el estudio explora las "líricas desviadas" de Mario Levrero y Alberto Laiseca, y muestra como responden productivamente a problemáticas estéticas, éticas y ontológicas propias de la vuelta del milenio, en el Río de la Plata y más allá.
Begräbnis der Toten
(2022)
The article is dedicated to the problem of social bonds that is negotiated in Troilus and Cressida. Troilus and Ulysses embody an old, traditional order of the world that is out of joint, while Cressida's behaviour and her way of interacting indicate a different and new regime of social regulation that is about to take over. With its complex superposition of (touches of) love and war, Troilus and Cressida brings together rituals of touch, anarchic speech acts, and a gendered perspective on the world that associates touch and temporality with 'frail' femininity and temptation. With unrivalled intensity, the play puts to the spectator that the basic condition of touch, i.e. exposing oneself to another, entails an incalculable risk. Hector tragically falls for the vulnerability inherent in touch and the audience suffers with him because they share this existential precondition on which modern society is 'founded.' The gloomy, inescapable atmosphere of societal crisis that Troilus and Cressida creates emphasises the fact that the fragility of touch is not to be overcome. The fractions - no matter whether Greek, Trojan, or those of loving couples - cannot simply be reunited to form a new, authentic entity. Generating at least some form of social cohesion therefore remains a challenge.