004 Datenverarbeitung; Informatik
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (342)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (168)
- Doctoral Thesis (160)
- Conference Proceeding (61)
- Postprint (50)
- Master's Thesis (10)
- Other (9)
- Preprint (3)
- Part of a Book (2)
- Bachelor Thesis (1)
Language
- English (613)
- German (193)
- Multiple languages (2)
Keywords
- Informatik (21)
- machine learning (20)
- Didaktik (15)
- Hochschuldidaktik (14)
- Ausbildung (13)
- Cloud Computing (13)
- answer set programming (13)
- cloud computing (13)
- maschinelles Lernen (11)
- Forschungsprojekte (10)
Institute
- Institut für Informatik und Computational Science (271)
- Hasso-Plattner-Institut für Digital Engineering gGmbH (214)
- Hasso-Plattner-Institut für Digital Engineering GmbH (136)
- Extern (65)
- Fachgruppe Betriebswirtschaftslehre (40)
- Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät (24)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (19)
- Institut für Mathematik (16)
- Bürgerliches Recht (12)
- Digital Engineering Fakultät (8)
To manage tabular data files and leverage their content in a given downstream task, practitioners often design and execute complex transformation pipelines to prepare them. The complexity of such pipelines stems from different factors, including the nature of the preparation tasks, often exploratory or ad-hoc to specific datasets; the large repertory of tools, algorithms, and frameworks that practitioners need to master; and the volume, variety, and velocity of the files to be prepared. Metadata plays a fundamental role in reducing this complexity: characterizing a file assists end users in the design of data preprocessing pipelines, and furthermore paves the way for suggestion, automation, and optimization of data preparation tasks.
Previous research in the areas of data profiling, data integration, and data cleaning, has focused on extracting and characterizing metadata regarding the content of tabular data files, i.e., about the records and attributes of tables. Content metadata are useful for the latter stages of a preprocessing pipeline, e.g., error correction, duplicate detection, or value normalization, but they require a properly formed tabular input. Therefore, these metadata are not relevant for the early stages of a preparation pipeline, i.e., to correctly parse tables out of files. In this dissertation, we turn our focus to what we call the structure of a tabular data file, i.e., the set of characters within a file that do not represent data values but are required to parse and understand the content of the file. We provide three different approaches to represent file structure, an explicit representation based on context-free grammars; an implicit representation based on file-wise similarity; and a learned representation based on machine learning.
In our first contribution, we use the grammar-based representation to characterize a set of over 3000 real-world csv files and identify multiple structural issues that let files deviate from the csv standard, e.g., by having inconsistent delimiters or containing multiple tables. We leverage our learnings about real-world files and propose Pollock, a benchmark to test how well systems parse csv files that have a non-standard structure, without any previous preparation. We report on our experiments on using Pollock to evaluate the performance of 16 real-world data management systems.
Following, we characterize the structure of files implicitly, by defining a measure of structural similarity for file pairs. We design a novel algorithm to compute this measure, which is based on a graph representation of the files' content. We leverage this algorithm and propose Mondrian, a graphical system to assist users in identifying layout templates in a dataset, classes of files that have the same structure, and therefore can be prepared by applying the same preparation pipeline.
Finally, we introduce MaGRiTTE, a novel architecture that uses self-supervised learning to automatically learn structural representations of files in the form of vectorial embeddings at three different levels: cell level, row level, and file level. We experiment with the application of structural embeddings for several tasks, namely dialect detection, row classification, and data preparation efforts estimation.
Our experimental results show that structural metadata, either identified explicitly on parsing grammars, derived implicitly as file-wise similarity, or learned with the help of machine learning architectures, is fundamental to automate several tasks, to scale up preparation to large quantities of files, and to provide repeatable preparation pipelines.