Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a frequent comorbidity among elderly patients and those with cardiovascular disease. CKD carries prognostic relevance. We aimed to describe patient characteristics, risk factor management and control status of patients in cardiac rehabilitation (CR), differentiated by presence or absence of CKD. Design and methods: Data from 92,071 inpatients with adequate information to calculate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula were analyzed at the beginning and the end of a 3-week CR stay. CKD was defined as estimated GFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2). Results: Compared with non-CKD patients, CKD patients were significantly older (72.0 versus 58.0 years) and more often had diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, and atherothrombotic manifestations (previous stroke, peripheral arterial disease), but fewer were current or previous smokers had a CHD family history. Exercise capacity was much lower in CKD (59 vs. 92Watts). Fewer patients with CKD were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but more had coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Patients with CKD compared with non-CKD less frequently received statins, acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), clopidogrel, beta blockers, and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and more frequently received angiotensin receptor blockers, insulin and oral anticoagulants. In CKD, mean low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol, and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) were slightly higher at baseline, while triglycerides were substantially lower. This lipid pattern did not change at the discharge visit, but overall control rates for all described parameters (with the exception of HDL-C) were improved substantially. At discharge, systolic blood pressure (BP) was higher in CKD (124 versus 121 mmHg) and diastolic BP was lower (72 versus 74 mmHg). At discharge, 68.7% of CKD versus 71.9% of non-CKD patients had LDL-C <100 mg/dl. Physical fitness on exercise testing improved substantially in both groups. When the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula was used for CKD classification, there was no clinically relevant change in these results. Conclusion: Within a short period of 3-4 weeks, CR led to substantial improvements in key risk factors such as lipid profile, blood pressure, and physical fitness for all patients, even if CKD was present.

This study investigated the incidence of hypertensive target organ damage (TOD), control of cardiovascular risk factors, and the short-term prognosis in hypertensive patients under contemporary guideline-oriented therapy. A total of 1,377 consecutive patients (mean age 58.2 +/- 9.9 years, 82.2 % male) with arterial hypertension were included in the ESTher (Endorganschaden, Therapie und Verlauf - target organ damage, therapy, and course) registry at 15 rehabilitation clinics within the framework of the National Genome Research Network. Cardiovascular risk factors, medication, comorbidities, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were assessed. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), left ventricular mass (LVM), left ventricular mass index (LVMI), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were determined by two-dimensional echocardiography. The mean follow-up was 513 +/- 159 days. Changes in continuous parameters were tested by the t test, changes in discrete characteristics are presented by means of transition tables and tested with the McNemar test. The mean LVEF was 59.3 +/- 9.9 %, both mean LVM (238.6 +/- 101.5 g) and LVMI (54.0 +/- 23.6 g/m(2.7)) were increased while relative wall thickness (RWT, 0.46 +/- 0.18) indicated the presence of concentric LVH. Of the patients, 10.2 % displayed renal dysfunction (estimated GFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)). The 1.5-year overall mortality was 1.2 %. Compared with discharge, at follow-up the proportion of patients with blood pressure (BP) values < 140/90 mmHg decreased from 68.7 % to 55.0 % (p < 0.001) and with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) values < 100 mg/dl from 62.6 % to 38.1 % (p < 0.001). At follow-up significantly more patients displayed a GFR value of < 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (10.2 % vs. 16.0 %, p < 0.001). A significant proportion of hypertensive rehabilitation participants displayed TOD including LVH and renal dysfunction. Even after stringent BP reduction, a considerable increase in nephropathy could be found after 18 months.

Background: Endomyocardial biopsy is considered as the gold standard in patients with suspected myocarditis. We aimed to evaluate the impact of bioptic findings on prediction of successful return to work. Methods: In 1153 patients (48.9 ± 12.4 years, 66.2% male), who were hospitalized due to symptoms of left heart failure between 2005 and 2012, an endomyocardial biopsy was performed. Routine clinical and laboratory data, sociodemographic parameters, and noninvasive and invasive cardiac variables including endomyocardial biopsy were registered. Data were linked with return to work data from the German statutory pension insurance program and analyzed by Cox regression. Results: A total of 220 patients had a complete data set of hospital and insurance information. Three quarters of patients were virus-positive (54.2% parvovirus B19, other or mixed infection 16.7%). Mean invasive left ventricular ejection fraction was 47.1% ± 18.6% (left ventricular ejection fraction <45% in 46.3%). Return to work was achieved after a mean interval of 168.8 ± 347.7 days in 220 patients (after 6, 12, and 24 months in 61.3%, 72.2%, and 76.4%). In multivariate regression analysis, only age (per 10 years, hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.10–1.46; p = 0.001) and left ventricular ejection fraction (per 5% increase, hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.03–1.12; p = 0.002) were associated with increased, elevated work intensity (heavy vs light, congestive heart failure, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.34–0.99; p < 0.049) with decreased probability of return to work. None of the endomyocardial biopsy–derived parameters was significantly associated with return to work in the total group as well as in the subgroup of patients with biopsy-proven myocarditis. Conclusion: Added to established predictors, bioptic data demonstrated no additional impact for return to work probability. Thus, socio-medical evaluation of patients with suspected myocarditis furthermore remains an individually oriented process based primarily on clinical and functional parameters.