Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (45)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (39)
- Working Paper (11)
- Part of a Book (7)
- Part of Periodical (1)
Keywords
- human capital (3)
- lifetime income (3)
- tuition fees (3)
- education return (2)
- tax reform (2)
- taxation (2)
- tertiary education (2)
- vocational education (2)
- Bologna process (1)
- IASP Program of the DAAD (1)
- Joint study programs (1)
- Sustainable fiscal policy (1)
- Transatlantic Degree Program (TDP) (1)
- cardinal utility function (1)
- centralization (1)
- decentralization (1)
- development cooperation (1)
- economics curriculum (1)
- education (1)
- ethnic differences (1)
- fiscal equalization (1)
- fiscal federalism (1)
- fiscal planning (1)
- fragile state (1)
- fragility index (1)
- higher education costs (1)
- income contingent loans (1)
- income tax (1)
- life-cycle analysis (1)
- microsimulation (1)
- poverty (1)
- redistribution (1)
- risk equalization (1)
- sacrifice principle (1)
- shadow economy (1)
- stable states (1)
- state theory (1)
- sustainable fiscal policy (1)
- tax administration (1)
- tax rate schedule (1)
- transfers (1)
- transformation (1)
Institute
Aus der Einleitung: Die derzeitige Situation in der Elektrizitätswirtschaft ist gekennzeichnet durch eine große Zahl anstehender Netzübernahmen infolge auslaufender Konzessionsverträge oder Arrondierungsmaßnahmen und einer Reihe dabei anhängiger Rechtsstreite, in denen insbesondere der "angemessene" Übernahmepreis strittig ist. Die in der Vergangenheit getätigten Netzübernahmen liefern zu der Frage nach dem "angemessenen" bzw. "rechtlich richtigen" Übernahmepreis keine Antwort, da die letztendlich gezahlten Preise i.d.R. das Ergebnis eines Verhandlungsprozesses waren und die damit verbundenen rechtlichen Streitfragen weiterhin offen sind. Die vorliegende Untersuchung greift die Frage nach dem "angemessenen" Übernahmepreis auf und versucht, eine aus ökonomischen Argumenten abgeleitete sowie mit den rechtlichen Rahmenbedingungen zu vereinbarende Antwort zu liefern.
Part of the intorduction: The task of writing a reliable and convincing paper on this topic is a very uneasy one because it is threefold: one has to know at least a bit about the agricultural sector, biology (or more precisely ecology), and about the sometimes beneficial but often distorting consequences of human activities. And all that has to be judged from the perspective of an economist who is aware of the steadily increasing uncertainties which are closely connected with post-modem sciences. Especially with regard to global, but also regional environmental issues, neither the conventional applied sciences nor the traditional professional consultancy deliver promising results. Today scientists have to tackle problems which are created by political necessities overwhelmingly caused by short-term human behavior, due in part to a serious lack of information on the longterm behavioral consequences. In these issues, typically, information stacks are high, scientific facts uncertain, individual as well as collective values disputed, and political decisions very urgent. "In general, the post-normal situation is one where the traditional opposition of 'hard'facts and 'soft' values is inverted. Here we find decisions that are 'hard' in every sense, for which the scientific inputs are irremediably 'soft'" (FUNTOWICZ/RAVETZ, 1991, p. 138).
Introduction
(1995)