Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (17)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (17) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (17)
Keywords
- Paris agreement (2)
- 2 degrees C target (1)
- Climate change (1)
- EU (1)
- Kyoto (flexible) mechanisms (1)
- Kyoto Protocol (1)
- President Trump (1)
- UNFCCC (1)
- United States (1)
- agent-based modeling (1)
- agent-based models (1)
- climate change (1)
- climate change co-operation (1)
- climate clubs (1)
- climate policy (1)
- climate regime (1)
- club goods (1)
- conditional commitments (1)
- enabling legislation (1)
- environmental treaties (1)
- expert survey (1)
- forecasting (1)
- global negotiations (1)
- kyoto protocol (1)
- non-compliance (1)
- policy effectiveness (1)
- political processes (1)
- prediction (1)
- ratification (1)
- reciprocity (1)
- simulation (1)
Using a novel agent-based model, we study how US withdrawal might influence the political process established by the Paris Agreement, and hence the prospects for reaching the collective goal to limit warming below 2 degrees C. Our model enables us to analyze to what extent reaching this goal despite US withdrawal would place more stringent requirements on other core elements of the Paris cooperation process. We find, first, that the effect of a US withdrawal depends critically on the extent to which member countries reciprocate others' promises and contributions. Second, while the 2 degrees C goal will likely be reached only under a very small set of conditions in any event, even temporary US withdrawal will further narrow this set significantly. Reaching this goal will then require other countries to step up their ambition at the first opportunity and to comply nearly 100% with their pledges, while maintaining high confidence in the Paris Agreements institutions. Third, although a US withdrawal will first primarily affect the United States' own emissions, it will eventually prove even more detrimental to other countries' emissions.
Major Countries
(2018)
To what extent has the European Union (EU) had a benign or retarding effect on what its member states would have undertaken in the absence of EU climate policies during 2008–2012? A measurement tool for the EU policy’s effect is developed and shows a benign average EU effect with considerable variation across countries. The EU’s policy effectiveness vis-à-vis its member states is explained by the EU’s non-compliance mechanism, the degree of usage of the Kyoto flexible mechanisms, and national pre-Kyoto emission reduction goals. Time-series cross-sectional analyses show that the EU’s non-compliance mechanism has no effect, while the ex-ante plans for using Kyoto flexible mechanisms and/or the ambitious pre-Kyoto emission reduction targets allow member states to escape constraints imposed by EU climate policy.
Although past research has emphasized the importance of international regimes for international gover-nance, systematic assessments of regime effects are missing. This article derives a standardized measure-ment concept for the effectiveness of international environmental regimes. It is based on a simultaneous evaluation of actual policy against a no-regime counterfactual and a collective optimum. Subsequently, the empirical feasibility of the measurement concept is demonstrated by way of two international treaties regu-lating transboundary air pollution in Europe. The results demonstrate that the regimes indeed show positive effects;but fall substantially short of the collective optima.