Refine
Year of publication
- 2020 (52) (remove)
Document Type
- Postprint (26)
- Article (25)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (52)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (52)
Keywords
- football (4)
- language acquisition (4)
- rate of perceived exertion (4)
- rolling averages (4)
- training load (4)
- weighted moving averages (4)
- Broca’s aphasia (2)
- Cardiac rehabilitation (2)
- Cardiovascular diseases (2)
- Children (2)
- Clinical psychology (2)
- ERPs (2)
- Education (2)
- Football (2)
- Frailty (2)
- Geriatric rehabilitation (2)
- Iambic/Trochaic Law (2)
- Mechanotendography (2)
- Outcome measures (2)
- Performance (2)
- Predictors (2)
- Psychotherapeutic competencies (2)
- Psychotherapy research (2)
- Randomized controlled trial (2)
- Repeated sprint (2)
- Role-playing (2)
- SNARC (2)
- Self-stigmatization (2)
- Simulated patients (2)
- Speed (2)
- Standardized patients (2)
- TAVI (2)
- Treatment pathways (2)
- Weight (2)
- Weight bias internalization (2)
- acute chronic workload ratio (2)
- aging (2)
- biological maturation (2)
- bone mineral density (2)
- bone pathologies (2)
- broadband and narrowband dimensions of behavior (2)
- carryover effects (2)
- childhood (2)
- coarticulation (2)
- common ground (2)
- concurrent training (2)
- confidence (2)
- derivation (2)
- developmental dyslexia (2)
- embodied cognition (2)
- emotion (2)
- episodic memory (2)
- exercise (2)
- external training load (2)
- eye-tracking (2)
- force (2)
- gestural organization (2)
- hemispheric asymmetry (2)
- hormones (2)
- human-robot interaction (2)
- impact on pre-activated Achilles tendon (2)
- inclusive education (2)
- injury (2)
- injury risk (2)
- internalizing behavior (2)
- maturity (2)
- mechanical tendinous oscillations (2)
- mental number line (MNL) (2)
- methodology (2)
- monitoring (2)
- morphological decomposition (2)
- morphological errors (2)
- musicality (2)
- neuroendocrine (2)
- newborns (2)
- oarsmen (2)
- on-water performance (2)
- osteoporosis (2)
- overreaching (2)
- overtraining (2)
- paralinguistic features (2)
- performance (2)
- perspective-taking (2)
- physical performance (2)
- physiology (2)
- plyometric training (2)
- postural sway (2)
- prefixes (2)
- privileged ground (2)
- psychosocial stress (2)
- race time (2)
- recognition (2)
- recollection (2)
- recovery (2)
- reliability (2)
- rhythm perception (2)
- rhythmic grouping (2)
- salivary alpha-amylase (2)
- social inclusion (2)
- sociometric neglect (2)
- sociometric status (2)
- spatial frequency (SF) (2)
- spatial-numerical associations (2)
- special educational needs (2)
- speech kinematics (2)
- speech motor control (2)
- speech perception (2)
- synthesized voice (2)
- talent (2)
- tasks (2)
- temporal frequency (2)
- text-to-speech (2)
- training (2)
- transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (2)
- ultrasound imaging (2)
- uncanny valley (2)
- validity (2)
- variability (2)
- vowels (2)
- words (2)
- AMSTAR 2 (1)
- EKP (1)
- ERP (1)
- Eyetracking (1)
- Partikelverben (1)
- Preaktivierung (1)
- Satzverarbeitung (1)
- Stretch-shortening cycle (1)
- Swimming performance (1)
- Vorhersagen (1)
- Young swimmers (1)
- adjectives (1)
- antonymy (1)
- conversational implicature (1)
- depression (1)
- epidemiology (1)
- evidence-based (1)
- eye tracking (1)
- major depression (1)
- medicine (1)
- methodological quality (1)
- negation (1)
- particle verbs (1)
- politeness (1)
- preactivation (1)
- prediction (1)
- psychiatry (1)
- public health (1)
- review (1)
- risk of bias (1)
- selbstbestimmtes Lesen (1)
- self-paced reading (1)
- sentence processing (1)
- social meaning (1)
- systematic (1)
Institute
- Strukturbereich Kognitionswissenschaften (52) (remove)
Background:
Several standards have been developed to assess methodological quality of systematic reviews (SR). One widely used tool is the AMSTAR. A recent update -AMSTAR 2 -is a 16 item evaluation tool that enables a detailed assessment of SR that include randomised (RCT) or non-randomised studies (NRS) of healthcare interventions.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study of SR on pharmacological or psychological interventions in major depression in adults was conducted. SR published during 2012-2017 were sampled from MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database of SR. Methodological quality was assessed using AMSTAR 2. Potential predictive factors associated with quality were examined.
Results:
In rating overall confidence in the results of 60 SR four reviews were rated "high", two were "moderate", one was "low" and 53 were "critically low". The mean AMSTAR 2 percentage score was 45.3% (standard deviation 22.6%) in a wide range from 7.1% to 93.8%. Predictors of higher quality were: type of review (higher quality in Cochrane Reviews), SR including only randomized trials and higher journal impact factor.
Limitations:
AMSTAR 2 is not intended to be used for the generation of a percentage score.
Conclusions:
According to AMSTAR 2 the overall methodological quality of SR on the treatment of adult major depression needs improvement. Although there is a high need for summarized information in the field of mental health, this work demonstrates the need to critically assess SR before using their findings. Better adherence to established reporting guidelines for SR is needed.