The search result changed since you submitted your search request. Documents might be displayed in a different sort order.
  • search hit 2 of 44
Back to Result List

Preposition copying and pruning in present-day English

  • This article investigates the nature of preposition copying and preposition pruning structures in present-day English. We begin by illustrating the two phenomena and consider how they might be accounted for in syntactic terms, and go on to explore the possibility that preposition copying and pruning arise for processing reasons. We then report on two acceptability judgement experiments examining the extent to which native speakers of English are sensitive to these types of 'error' in language comprehension. Our results indicate that preposition copying creates redundancy rather than ungrammaticality, whereas preposition pruning creates processing problems for comprehenders that may render it unacceptable in timed (but not necessarily in untimed) judgement tasks. Our findings furthermore illustrate the usefulness of combining corpus studies and experimentally elicited data for gaining a clearer picture of usage and acceptability, and the potential benefits of examining syntactic phenomena from both a theoretical and a processingThis article investigates the nature of preposition copying and preposition pruning structures in present-day English. We begin by illustrating the two phenomena and consider how they might be accounted for in syntactic terms, and go on to explore the possibility that preposition copying and pruning arise for processing reasons. We then report on two acceptability judgement experiments examining the extent to which native speakers of English are sensitive to these types of 'error' in language comprehension. Our results indicate that preposition copying creates redundancy rather than ungrammaticality, whereas preposition pruning creates processing problems for comprehenders that may render it unacceptable in timed (but not necessarily in untimed) judgement tasks. Our findings furthermore illustrate the usefulness of combining corpus studies and experimentally elicited data for gaining a clearer picture of usage and acceptability, and the potential benefits of examining syntactic phenomena from both a theoretical and a processing perspective.show moreshow less

Download full text files

  • phr527.pdfeng
    (367KB)

    SHA-1: 18201411793930707ecb1ae4b2929d52666c2898

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Andrew Radford, Claudia FelserORCiDGND, Oliver Boxell
URN:urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-414898
DOI:https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-41489
ISSN:1866-8364
Title of parent work (English):Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe
Publication series (Volume number):Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe (527)
Publication type:Postprint
Language:English
Date of first publication:2019/02/12
Publication year:2012
Publishing institution:Universität Potsdam
Release date:2019/02/12
Tag:syntactic blends
Issue:527
Number of pages:24
Source:English Language and Linguistics 16 (2012) 3, pp. 403–426 DOI 10.1017/S1360674312000172
Organizational units:Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät
DDC classification:8 Literatur / 82 Englische, altenglische Literaturen / 820 Englische, altenglische Literaturen
Peer review:Referiert
Publishing method:Open Access
Grantor:Cambridge University Press (CUP)
License (German):License LogoKeine öffentliche Lizenz: Unter Urheberrechtsschutz
External remark:Bibliographieeintrag der Originalveröffentlichung/Quelle
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.