Das Suchergebnis hat sich seit Ihrer Suchanfrage verändert. Eventuell werden Dokumente in anderer Reihenfolge angezeigt.
  • Treffer 6 von 425
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Exploring the longitudinal stability of food neophilia and dietary quality and their prospective relationship in older adults

  • Poor dietary quality is a major cause of morbidity, making the promotion of healthy eating a societal priority. Older adults are a critical target group for promoting healthy eating to enable healthy aging. One factor suggested to promote healthy eating is the willingness to try unfamiliar foods, referred to as food neophilia. This two-wave longitudinal study explored the stability of food neophilia and dietary quality and their prospective relationship over three years, analyzing self-reported data from N = 960 older adults (MT1 = 63.4, range = 50–84) participating in the NutriAct Family Study (NFS) in a cross-lagged panel design. Dietary quality was rated using the NutriAct diet score, based on the current evidence for chronic disease prevention. Food neophilia was measured using the Variety Seeking Tendency Scale. The analyses revealed high a longitudinal stability of both constructs and a small positive cross-sectional correlation between them. Food neophilia had no prospective effect on dietary quality, whereas a very smallPoor dietary quality is a major cause of morbidity, making the promotion of healthy eating a societal priority. Older adults are a critical target group for promoting healthy eating to enable healthy aging. One factor suggested to promote healthy eating is the willingness to try unfamiliar foods, referred to as food neophilia. This two-wave longitudinal study explored the stability of food neophilia and dietary quality and their prospective relationship over three years, analyzing self-reported data from N = 960 older adults (MT1 = 63.4, range = 50–84) participating in the NutriAct Family Study (NFS) in a cross-lagged panel design. Dietary quality was rated using the NutriAct diet score, based on the current evidence for chronic disease prevention. Food neophilia was measured using the Variety Seeking Tendency Scale. The analyses revealed high a longitudinal stability of both constructs and a small positive cross-sectional correlation between them. Food neophilia had no prospective effect on dietary quality, whereas a very small positive prospective effect of dietary quality on food neophilia was found. Our findings give initial insights into the positive relation of food neophilia and a health-promoting diet in aging and underscore the need for more in-depth research, e.g., on the constructs’ developmental trajectories and potential critical windows of opportunity for promoting food neophilia.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

  • zhr839.pdfeng
    (698KB)

    SHA-512:de0b2ebe886a5a21f69321556a817013b9e38e0ff42cb162e1094c25e87a00a34cd915c93341a476e223e9901fc7d3b32347fcc1674de636436e14e403762277

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Hanna Rosalie WortmannORCiDGND, Ulrike Alexandra GischORCiDGND, Manuela M. BergmannORCiDGND, Petra WarschburgerORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-589134
DOI:https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-58913
ISSN:1866-8364
Untertitel (Englisch):a cross-lagged panel analysis
Schriftenreihe (Bandnummer):Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe (839)
Publikationstyp:Postprint
Sprache:Englisch
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:01.03.2023
Erscheinungsjahr:2023
Veröffentlichende Institution:Universität Potsdam
Datum der Freischaltung:24.04.2023
Freies Schlagwort / Tag:NutriAct Family Study; cross-lagged panel analysis; dietary quality; food neophilia; healthy eating
Ausgabe:839
Seitenanzahl:16
Quelle:Nutrients 15 (2023) 5, Art. 1248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15051248
Organisationseinheiten:Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Strukturbereich Kognitionswissenschaften
DDC-Klassifikation:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Peer Review:Referiert
Publikationsweg:Open Access / Green Open-Access
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoCC-BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International
Externe Anmerkung:Bibliographieeintrag der Originalveröffentlichung
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.