• Treffer 1 von 2
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Accountability, performance and legitimacy in the welfare state

  • Accountability is one of the most widely discussed concepts of public administration research and teaching in the last decade. But why is this case? Obviously accountability is, like its counterpart transparency, a “magic concept”, and an indispensable part of the prominent and omnipresent discourse on “good governance” as well as a significant element in debates about public sector reform. The same holds true for performance, which has been a magic and contested concept ever since New Public Management (NPM) entered the discourse about “modern” processes and structures of the public sector. But the third term in the title of this paper, legitimacy, even though it is one of the basic concepts of political science and democracy and is at the heart of Max Weber's theory of bureaucracy, has been surprisingly absent from current debates about the challenges of modern public administration, and for that sake also about the future of the welfare state. This chapter argues that different concepts of legitimacy lie at the heart of mostAccountability is one of the most widely discussed concepts of public administration research and teaching in the last decade. But why is this case? Obviously accountability is, like its counterpart transparency, a “magic concept”, and an indispensable part of the prominent and omnipresent discourse on “good governance” as well as a significant element in debates about public sector reform. The same holds true for performance, which has been a magic and contested concept ever since New Public Management (NPM) entered the discourse about “modern” processes and structures of the public sector. But the third term in the title of this paper, legitimacy, even though it is one of the basic concepts of political science and democracy and is at the heart of Max Weber's theory of bureaucracy, has been surprisingly absent from current debates about the challenges of modern public administration, and for that sake also about the future of the welfare state. This chapter argues that different concepts of legitimacy lie at the heart of most debates about accountability and performance (input, output and throughput legitimacy), and that a better understanding of the relationships between accountability, performance and legitimacy can clarify some of the puzzles of contemporary research.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Werner JannORCiDGND
ISBN:978-1-4724-7059-1 (print)
ISBN:978-1-315-61271-3 (epub)
Titel des übergeordneten Werks (Englisch):The Routledge Handbook to Accountability and Welfare State Reforms in Europe
Untertitel (Deutsch):If accountability is the answer, what was the question?
Verlag:Routledge
Verlagsort:London
Herausgeber*in(nen):Per Lægreid, Tom Cristensen
Publikationstyp:Teil eines Buches (Kapitel)
Sprache:Englisch
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:08.12.2016
Erscheinungsjahr:2016
Veröffentlichende Institution:Universität Potsdam
Datum der Freischaltung:03.03.2017
Erste Seite:31
Letzte Seite:44
RVK - Regensburger Verbundklassifikation:MF 9200 ; MK 5220
Organisationseinheiten:Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoKeine öffentliche Lizenz: Unter Urheberrechtsschutz
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.