The search result changed since you submitted your search request. Documents might be displayed in a different sort order.
  • search hit 3 of 44
Back to Result List

Training-induced improvement of noncanonical sentence production does not generalize to comprehension: evidence for modality-specific processes

  • The presence or absence of generalization after treatment can provide important insights into the functional relationship between cognitive processes. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between the cognitive processes that underlie sentence comprehension and production in aphasia. Using data from seven participants who took part in a case-series intervention study that focused on noncanonical sentence production [Stadie et al. (2008). Unambiguous generalization effects after treatment of noncanonical sentence production in German agrammatism. Brain and Language, 104, 211-229], we identified patterns of impairments and generalization effects for the two modalities. Results showed (a) dissociations between sentence structures and modalities before treatment, (b) an absence of cross-modal generalization from production to comprehension after treatment, and (c), a co-occurrence of spared comprehension before treatment and generalization across sentence structures within production after treatment. TheseThe presence or absence of generalization after treatment can provide important insights into the functional relationship between cognitive processes. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between the cognitive processes that underlie sentence comprehension and production in aphasia. Using data from seven participants who took part in a case-series intervention study that focused on noncanonical sentence production [Stadie et al. (2008). Unambiguous generalization effects after treatment of noncanonical sentence production in German agrammatism. Brain and Language, 104, 211-229], we identified patterns of impairments and generalization effects for the two modalities. Results showed (a) dissociations between sentence structures and modalities before treatment, (b) an absence of cross-modal generalization from production to comprehension after treatment, and (c), a co-occurrence of spared comprehension before treatment and generalization across sentence structures within production after treatment. These findings are in line with the assumption of modality-specific, but interacting, cognitive processes in sentence comprehension and production. More specifically, this interaction is assumed to be unidirectional, allowing treatment-induced improvements in production to be supported by preserved comprehension.show moreshow less

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Astrid SchröderGND, Frank BurchertORCiDGND, Nicole StadieORCiDGND
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2014.968535
ISSN:0264-3294
ISSN:1464-0627
Pubmed ID:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25350579
Title of parent work (English):Cognitive neuropsychology
Publisher:Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
Place of publishing:Abingdon
Publication type:Article
Language:English
Year of first publication:2015
Publication year:2015
Release date:2017/03/27
Tag:aphasia treatment; cross-modal generalization; sentence comprehension; sentence production; syntactic processing of noncanonical sentences
Volume:32
Issue:3-4
Number of pages:26
First page:195
Last Page:220
Funding institution:Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [01GA01001]
Organizational units:Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Strukturbereich Kognitionswissenschaften / Department Linguistik
Peer review:Referiert
Institution name at the time of the publication:Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Institut für Linguistik / Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.