• search hit 8 of 11
Back to Result List

Does case marking affect agreement attraction in comprehension?

  • Previous studies have suggested that distinctive case marking on noun phrases reduces attraction effects in production, i.e., the tendency to produce a verb that agrees with a nonsubject noun. An important open question is whether attraction effects are modulated by case information in sentence comprehension. To address this question, we conducted three attraction experiments in Armenian, a language with a rich and productive case system. The experiments showed clear attraction effects, and they also revealed an overall role of case marking such that participants showed faster response and reading times when the nouns in the sentence had different case. However, we found little indication that distinctive case marking modulated attraction effects. We present a theoretical proposal of how case and number information may be used differentially during agreement licensing in comprehension. More generally, this work sheds light on the nature of the retrieval cues deployed when completing morphosyntactic dependencies.

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Serine Avetisyan, Sol LagoORCiD, Shravan VasishthORCiDGND
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2020.104087
ISSN:0749-596X
ISSN:1096-0821
Title of parent work (English):Journal of memory and language
Publisher:Elsevier
Place of publishing:San Diego
Publication type:Article
Language:English
Date of first publication:2020/02/14
Publication year:2020
Release date:2023/04/19
Tag:Case; Eastern Armenian; attraction; comprehension; cue-based; retrieval; subject-verb agreement
Volume:112
Article number:104087
Number of pages:18
Funding institution:University of Potsdam; Erasmus Mundus Joint Doctorate (EMJD) Fellowship; [2012-0025-EM II-EMJD]
Organizational units:Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Strukturbereich Kognitionswissenschaften / Department Linguistik
DDC classification:1 Philosophie und Psychologie / 15 Psychologie / 150 Psychologie
4 Sprache / 41 Linguistik / 410 Linguistik
Peer review:Referiert
Publishing method:Open Access / Hybrid Open-Access
License (German):License LogoCC-BY-NC-ND - Namensnennung, nicht kommerziell, keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.