The search result changed since you submitted your search request. Documents might be displayed in a different sort order.
  • search hit 3 of 7
Back to Result List

Intentional forgetting in organizations

  • To cope with the already large, and ever increasing, amount of information stored in organizational memory, "forgetting," as an important human memory process, might be transferred to the organizational context. Especially in intentionally planned change processes (e.g., change management), forgetting is an important precondition to impede the recall of obsolete routines and adapt to new strategic objectives accompanied by new organizational routines. We first comprehensively review the literature on the need for organizational forgetting and particularly on accidental vs. intentional forgetting. We discuss the current state of the art of theory and empirical evidence on forgetting from cognitive psychology in order to infer mechanisms applicable to the organizational context. In this respect, we emphasize retrieval theories and the relevance of retrieval cues important for forgetting. Subsequently, we transfer the empirical evidence that the elimination of retrieval cues leads to faster forgetting to the forgetting of organizationalTo cope with the already large, and ever increasing, amount of information stored in organizational memory, "forgetting," as an important human memory process, might be transferred to the organizational context. Especially in intentionally planned change processes (e.g., change management), forgetting is an important precondition to impede the recall of obsolete routines and adapt to new strategic objectives accompanied by new organizational routines. We first comprehensively review the literature on the need for organizational forgetting and particularly on accidental vs. intentional forgetting. We discuss the current state of the art of theory and empirical evidence on forgetting from cognitive psychology in order to infer mechanisms applicable to the organizational context. In this respect, we emphasize retrieval theories and the relevance of retrieval cues important for forgetting. Subsequently, we transfer the empirical evidence that the elimination of retrieval cues leads to faster forgetting to the forgetting of organizational routines, as routines are part of organizational memory. We then propose a classification of cues (context, sensory, business process-related cues) that are relevant in the forgetting of routines, and discuss a meta-cue called the "situational strength" cue, which is relevant if cues of an old and a new routine are present simultaneously. Based on the classification as business process-related cues (information, team, task, object cues), we propose mechanisms to accelerate forgetting by eliminating specific cues based on the empirical and theoretical state of the art. We conclude that in intentional organizational change processes, the elimination of cues to accelerate forgetting should be used in change management practices.show moreshow less

Download full text files

  • pwsr127.pdfeng
    (3144KB)

    SHA-1: 484454ba2c11f5acb75c78547c1b8d04b43afb50

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Annette KlugeORCiDGND, Norbert GronauORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-446022
DOI:https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-44602
ISSN:1867-5808
Title of parent work (German):Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe
Subtitle (English):the importance of eliminating retrieval cues for implementing new routines
Publication series (Volume number):Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe (127)
Publication type:Postprint
Language:English
Date of first publication:2020/06/02
Publication year:2018
Publishing institution:Universität Potsdam
Release date:2020/06/02
Tag:business processes; change management; knowledge management; multi-actor routines; organizational memory; situational strength
Issue:127
Number of pages:19
Source:Frontiers in Psychology 9 (2018) 51 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00051
Organizational units:Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät
DDC classification:1 Philosophie und Psychologie / 15 Psychologie / 150 Psychologie
Peer review:Referiert
Publishing method:Open Access
License (German):License LogoCC-BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.