Das Suchergebnis hat sich seit Ihrer Suchanfrage verändert. Eventuell werden Dokumente in anderer Reihenfolge angezeigt.
  • Treffer 3 von 9
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Derivational morphology in agrammatic aphasia

  • Although a relatively large number of studies on acquired language impairments have tested the case of derivational morphology, none of these have specifically investigated whether there are differences in how prefixed and suffixed derived words are impaired. Based on linguistic and psycholinguistic considerations on prefixed and suffixed derived words, differences in how these two types of derivations are processed, and consequently impaired, are predicted. In the present study, we investigated the errors produced in reading aloud simple, prefixed, and suffixed words by three German individuals with agrammatic aphasia (NN, LG, SA). We found that, while NN and LG produced similar numbers of errors with prefixed and suffixed words, SA showed a selective impairment for prefixed words. Furthermore, NN and SA produced more errors specifically involving the affix with prefixed words than with suffixed words. We discuss our findings in terms of relative position of stem and affix in prefixed and suffixed words, as well as in terms ofAlthough a relatively large number of studies on acquired language impairments have tested the case of derivational morphology, none of these have specifically investigated whether there are differences in how prefixed and suffixed derived words are impaired. Based on linguistic and psycholinguistic considerations on prefixed and suffixed derived words, differences in how these two types of derivations are processed, and consequently impaired, are predicted. In the present study, we investigated the errors produced in reading aloud simple, prefixed, and suffixed words by three German individuals with agrammatic aphasia (NN, LG, SA). We found that, while NN and LG produced similar numbers of errors with prefixed and suffixed words, SA showed a selective impairment for prefixed words. Furthermore, NN and SA produced more errors specifically involving the affix with prefixed words than with suffixed words. We discuss our findings in terms of relative position of stem and affix in prefixed and suffixed words, as well as in terms of specific properties of prefixes and suffixes.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

  • phr648.pdfeng
    (1880KB)

    SHA-512:a24778e03665c746ddf8421dc47b33f176f297e4723ce7a4cbd53e77588463c629c88e59ed33cafea4bb90f1a0206e44b2c8bb131f873cb0ce758681fa178ecc

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Laura Anna CiaccioORCiD, Frank BurchertORCiDGND, Carlo Semenza
URN:urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-473995
DOI:https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-47399
ISSN:1866-8364
Titel des übergeordneten Werks (Deutsch):Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe
Untertitel (Englisch):a comparison between prefixed and suffixed words
Publikationstyp:Postprint
Sprache:Englisch
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:05.08.2020
Erscheinungsjahr:2020
Veröffentlichende Institution:Universität Potsdam
Datum der Freischaltung:05.08.2020
Freies Schlagwort / Tag:Broca’s aphasia; derivation; morphological decomposition; morphological errors; prefixes
Ausgabe:648
Seitenanzahl:17
Quelle:Frontiers in Psychology 11 (2020) 1070 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01070
Organisationseinheiten:Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Strukturbereich Kognitionswissenschaften
DDC-Klassifikation:1 Philosophie und Psychologie / 15 Psychologie / 150 Psychologie
Peer Review:Referiert
Publikationsweg:Open Access / Green Open-Access
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoCC-BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International
Externe Anmerkung:Bibliographieeintrag der Originalveröffentlichung/Quelle
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.