• search hit 6 of 20
Back to Result List

What happens when they think they are right?

  • Background: Comprehension of non-canonical sentences is frequently characterised by chance level performance in people with aphasia (PWA). Chance level performance has been interpreted as guessing, but online data does not support this rendering. It is still not clear whether the incorrect sentence processing is guided by the compensatory strategies that PWA might employ to overcome linguistic difficulties.Aims: We aim to study to what extent people with non-fluent aphasia are aware of their sentence comprehension deficits.Methods & Procedures: This study combined offline and online data to investigate the effect of word order and error-awareness on sentence comprehension in a group of PWA and non-brain damaged (NBD) participants. The offline tasks involved auditory sentence picture-matching immediately followed by a confidence rating (CR). Participants were asked to judge the perceived correctness of their previous answer. Online data consisted of eye-tracking.Outcomes & Results: Replicating previous findings, PWA had significantlyBackground: Comprehension of non-canonical sentences is frequently characterised by chance level performance in people with aphasia (PWA). Chance level performance has been interpreted as guessing, but online data does not support this rendering. It is still not clear whether the incorrect sentence processing is guided by the compensatory strategies that PWA might employ to overcome linguistic difficulties.Aims: We aim to study to what extent people with non-fluent aphasia are aware of their sentence comprehension deficits.Methods & Procedures: This study combined offline and online data to investigate the effect of word order and error-awareness on sentence comprehension in a group of PWA and non-brain damaged (NBD) participants. The offline tasks involved auditory sentence picture-matching immediately followed by a confidence rating (CR). Participants were asked to judge the perceived correctness of their previous answer. Online data consisted of eye-tracking.Outcomes & Results: Replicating previous findings, PWA had significantly worse comprehension of Theme-Agent order compared to Agent-Theme order sentences. Controls showed ceiling level sentence comprehension. CR was a poor predictor of response accuracy in PWA, but moderate-good in NBD. A total of 6.8% of judgements were classified as guessing by PWA. Post hoc gaze data analysis indicated that CR was a predictor of the fixation pattern during the presentation of the linguistic stimuli.Conclusions: Results suggest that PWA were mostly unaware of their sentence comprehension errors and did not consciously employ strategies to compensate for their difficulties.show moreshow less

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Miren ArantzetaORCiD, Janet Webster, Itziar Laka, Maite Martinez-Zabaleta, David HowardORCiD
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2017.1423270
ISSN:0268-7038
ISSN:1464-5041
Title of parent work (English):Aphasiology : an international, interdisciplinary journal
Subtitle (English):Error awareness analysis of sentence comprehension deficits in aphasia
Publisher:Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
Place of publishing:Abingdon
Publication type:Article
Language:English
Date of first publication:2018/01/05
Publication year:2018
Release date:2022/03/17
Tag:Aphasia; anosognosia; error awareness; eye-tracking; sentence comprehension
Volume:32
Issue:12
Number of pages:27
First page:1418
Last Page:1444
Funding institution:Erasmus Mundus Joint International Doctorate for Experimental Approaches to Language and Brain (IDEALAB) of the University of Groningen [2012-1713/001-001, 2012-0025]; Erasmus Mundus Joint International Doctorate for Experimental Approaches to Language and Brain (IDEALAB) of the University of Newcastle (UK) [2012-1713/001-001, 2012-0025]; Erasmus Mundus Joint International Doctorate for Experimental Approaches to Language and Brain (IDEALAB) of the University of Potsdam (DE) [2012-1713/001-001, 2012-0025]; Erasmus Mundus Joint International Doctorate for Experimental Approaches to Language and Brain (IDEALAB) of the University of Trento (IT) [2012-1713/001-001, 2012-0025]; Macquarie University, Sydney (AU) [2012-1713/001-001, 2012-0025]; Advancing the European Multilingual Experience (AThEME FP7) [613465]; Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [FFI2015-64183]; Basque GovernmentBasque Government [IT665-13]
Organizational units:Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Strukturbereich Kognitionswissenschaften / Department Linguistik
DDC classification:4 Sprache / 41 Linguistik / 410 Linguistik
License (German):License LogoCC-BY-NC-ND - Namensnennung, nicht kommerziell, keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.