• Treffer 1 von 8
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Impact of applying a diabetes risk score in primary care on change in physical activity

  • Aim There is little evidence of the impact of diabetes risk scores on individual diabetes risk factors, motivation for behaviour changes and mental health. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of applying a noninvasive diabetes risk score in primary care as component of routine health checks on physical activity and secondary outcomes. Methods Cluster randomised trial, in which primary care physicians (PCPs), randomised (1:1) by minimisation, enrolled participants with statutory health insurance without known diabetes, >= 35 years of age with a body mass index >= 27.0 kg/m(2). The German Diabetes Risk Score was applied as add-on to the standard routine health check, conducted in the controls. Primary outcome was the difference in participants' physical activity (International Physical Activity Questionnaire) after 12 months. Secondary outcomes included body mass index, perceived health, anxiety, depression, and motivation for lifestyle change. Analysis was by intention-to-treat principle using mixed models.Aim There is little evidence of the impact of diabetes risk scores on individual diabetes risk factors, motivation for behaviour changes and mental health. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of applying a noninvasive diabetes risk score in primary care as component of routine health checks on physical activity and secondary outcomes. Methods Cluster randomised trial, in which primary care physicians (PCPs), randomised (1:1) by minimisation, enrolled participants with statutory health insurance without known diabetes, >= 35 years of age with a body mass index >= 27.0 kg/m(2). The German Diabetes Risk Score was applied as add-on to the standard routine health check, conducted in the controls. Primary outcome was the difference in participants' physical activity (International Physical Activity Questionnaire) after 12 months. Secondary outcomes included body mass index, perceived health, anxiety, depression, and motivation for lifestyle change. Analysis was by intention-to-treat principle using mixed models. Results 36 PCPs were randomised; remaining 30 PCPs (intervention: n = 16; control: n = 14) recruited 315 participants (intervention: n = 153; controls: n = 162). A slight increase in physical activity was observed in the intervention group with an adjusted mean change of 388 (95% confidence interval: - 235; 1011) metabolic equivalents minutes per week. There were no relevant changes in secondary outcomes. Conclusions The application of a noninvasive diabetes risk score alone is not effective in promoting physical activity in primary care. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03234322, registration date: July 31, 2017).zeige mehrzeige weniger

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Esther Seidel-JacobsORCiD, Fiona Kohl, Miguel Tamayo, Joachim Rosenbauer, Matthias Bernd SchulzeORCiDGND, Oliver Kuss, Wolfgang RathmannORCiDGND
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-022-01895-y
ISSN:0940-5429
ISSN:1432-5233
Pubmed ID:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35551495
Titel des übergeordneten Werks (Englisch):Acta diabetologica
Untertitel (Deutsch):a pragmatic cluster randomised trial
Verlag:Springer
Verlagsort:Mailand
Publikationstyp:Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Sprache:Englisch
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:13.05.2022
Erscheinungsjahr:2022
Datum der Freischaltung:24.05.2024
Freies Schlagwort / Tag:Physical activity; Prevention; Primary care; Risk prediction model; Risk score; Type 2 diabetes
Band:59
Ausgabe:8
Seitenanzahl:10
Erste Seite:1031
Letzte Seite:1040
Fördernde Institution:Projekt DEAL; German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF);; German Federal Ministry of Health; Ministry of Innovation, Science and; Research of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia
Organisationseinheiten:Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Institut für Ernährungswissenschaft
DDC-Klassifikation:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Peer Review:Referiert
Publikationsweg:Open Access / Hybrid Open-Access
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoCC-BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.