• Treffer 1 von 3
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Share the code, not just the data

  • In 2019 the Journal of Memory and Language instituted an open data and code policy; this policy requires that, as a rule, code and data be released at the latest upon publication. How effective is this policy? We compared 59 papers published before, and 59 papers published after, the policy took effect. After the policy was in place, the rate of data sharing increased by more than 50%. We further looked at whether papers published under the open data policy were reproducible, in the sense that the published results should be possible to regenerate given the data, and given the code, when code was provided. For 8 out of the 59 papers, data sets were inaccessible. The reproducibility rate ranged from 34% to 56%, depending on the reproducibility criteria. The strongest predictor of whether an attempt to reproduce would be successful is the presence of the analysis code: it increases the probability of reproducing reported results by almost 40%. We propose two simple steps that can increase the reproducibility of published papers: shareIn 2019 the Journal of Memory and Language instituted an open data and code policy; this policy requires that, as a rule, code and data be released at the latest upon publication. How effective is this policy? We compared 59 papers published before, and 59 papers published after, the policy took effect. After the policy was in place, the rate of data sharing increased by more than 50%. We further looked at whether papers published under the open data policy were reproducible, in the sense that the published results should be possible to regenerate given the data, and given the code, when code was provided. For 8 out of the 59 papers, data sets were inaccessible. The reproducibility rate ranged from 34% to 56%, depending on the reproducibility criteria. The strongest predictor of whether an attempt to reproduce would be successful is the presence of the analysis code: it increases the probability of reproducing reported results by almost 40%. We propose two simple steps that can increase the reproducibility of published papers: share the analysis code, and attempt to reproduce one's own analysis using only the shared materials.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Anna LaurinavichyuteORCiDGND, Himanshu YadavORCiD, Shravan VasishthORCiDGND
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2022.104332
ISSN:0749-596X
ISSN:1096-0821
Titel des übergeordneten Werks (Englisch):Journal of memory and language
Untertitel (Englisch):a case study of the reproducibility of articles published in the Journal of Memory and Language under the open data policy
Verlag:Elsevier
Verlagsort:San Diego
Publikationstyp:Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Sprache:Englisch
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:02.06.2022
Erscheinungsjahr:2022
Datum der Freischaltung:04.11.2022
Freies Schlagwort / Tag:Journal policy; Meta-research; Open; Open data; Reproducibility; Reproducible statistical analyses; science
Band:125
Aufsatznummer:104332
Seitenanzahl:12
Fördernde Institution:Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation); [317633480, SFB 1287]
Organisationseinheiten:Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Strukturbereich Kognitionswissenschaften / Department Linguistik
DDC-Klassifikation:1 Philosophie und Psychologie / 15 Psychologie / 150 Psychologie
3 Sozialwissenschaften / 37 Bildung und Erziehung / 370 Bildung und Erziehung
4 Sprache / 40 Sprache / 400 Sprache
Peer Review:Referiert
Publikationsweg:Open Access / Hybrid Open-Access
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoCC-BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.