Commento alla sentenza del Landgericht Köln del 7 maggio 2012 in tema di circoncisione e commento alla nuova normativa § 1631d del codice civile tedesco (BGB)
- Kommentar zu § 1631d BGB (Beschneidung aus religiösen Gründen, elterliches Sorgerecht), Kommentar zum Urteil des Landgerichts Köln vom 7. Mai 2012 (Strafrecht, Religionsfreiheit)
- In May 2012 a misleading decision of the Landgericht (Court of Appeal) Cologne declared that male circumcision in children amounts to be a criminal offence, even if performed lege artis and with the consent of the parents. The article pays attention to the new legislation of December 2012 introduced into the BGB as a legal framework of male circumcision with regard to the right of freedom of religion and the parental rights in education especially for Jewish and Muslims in Germany.
Author details: | Stefan GatzhammerGND |
---|---|
URN: | urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-72075 |
Publication series (Volume number): | Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Rechtswissenschaftliche Reihe (2) |
Publication type: | Postprint |
Language: | Multiple languages |
Publication year: | 2013 |
Publishing institution: | Universität Potsdam |
Release date: | 2014/11/17 |
Tag: | BGB; Beschneidung aus religiösen Motiven; Religionsrecht; Strafrecht; elterliches Sorgerecht German civil code; criminal law; legal custody; male circumcision; religious law |
Source: | Il Diritto Ecclesiastico 124 (2013) 355-364 |
Organizational units: | Juristische Fakultät / Bürgerliches Recht |
DDC classification: | 3 Sozialwissenschaften / 34 Recht / 340 Recht |
License (German): | Keine öffentliche Lizenz: Unter Urheberrechtsschutz |