TY - JOUR A1 - Kuhlmann, Sabine T1 - Frankreichs inkrementeller Weg der Kommunalreform : territoriale Konsolidierung ohne Fusion Y1 - 2013 SN - 978-3-8329-7917-1 ER - TY - THES A1 - Genschow, Jan T1 - Fahranfängervorbereitung als Bildungsinstitution : ein internationaler Vergleich Y1 - 2013 CY - Potsdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kumarasingham, Harshan T1 - Exporting executive accountability? - Westminster legacies of executive power JF - Parliamentary affairs : a journal of representative politics N2 - The Westminster system places great power upon the Executive with minimal accountabilities. Despite the dissolution of the British Empire, so many countries maintained the Westminster system whether it was transplanted or implanted to their soil. The Westminster system provides various actors with a great potential of increasing power autonomy over others due to the high levels of flexibility and manoeuvrability. Political actors, especially following independence, were able to operate generally unencumbered by fixed and formal institutional expectations. This allowed the countries and their executive, particularly the Prime Minister, the ability to mould and establish constitutional traditions, which in turn shaped the nascent polity that surrounded the real and constitutional independence. This article examines the Westminster systems critical legacy to accountability and its impact on executive power. Y1 - 2013 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss008 SN - 0031-2290 VL - 66 IS - 3 SP - 579 EP - 596 PB - Oxford Univ. Press CY - Oxford ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Ganghof, Steffen T1 - Equality-based comparison how to justify democratic institutions in the Real World JF - Politics N2 - Political scientists regularly justify particular democratic institutions. This article explores two desiderata for such justifications. The first is a formal equality baseline which puts the burden of justification on those who favour more unequal institutions. This baseline is seen as an implication of the rule of law. The second desideratum, the comparison requirement, builds on the first: adequate justifications of particular institutions must compare them to the best alternative, and this comparison must consider the costs for political equality. The two desiderata are applied to political science debates about the proportionality of the electoral system and bicameral systems of legislative decision-making. KW - electoral systems KW - second chambers KW - political equality KW - institutional design KW - public justification Y1 - 2013 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.12002 SN - 0263-3957 VL - 33 IS - 2 SP - 101 EP - 111 PB - Wiley-Blackwell CY - Hoboken ER - TY - BOOK ED - Imhof-Rudolph, Heike T1 - Entwicklungspolitik - ein zu weites Feld? T3 - Forum Entwicklungspolitik Brandenburg Y1 - 2013 SN - 978-3-94180-79-5 VL - 3 PB - VENROB CY - Potsdam ER - TY - BOOK A1 - Imhof-Rudolph, Heike T1 - Entwicklungspolitik - ein zu weites Feld? Y1 - 2013 SN - 978-3-941880-79-5 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Ganghof, Steffen T1 - Does public reason require super-majoritarian democracy? Liberty, equality, and history in the justification of political institutions JF - Politics, philosophy & economics N2 - The project of public-reason liberalism faces a basic problem: publicly justified principles are typically too abstract and vague to be directly applied to practical political disputes, whereas applicable specifications of these principles are not uniquely publicly justified. One solution could be a legislative procedure that selects one member from the eligible set of inconclusively justified proposals. Yet if liberal principles are too vague to select sufficiently specific legislative proposals, can they, nevertheless, select specific legislative procedures? Based on the work of Gerald Gaus, this article argues that the only candidate for a conclusively justified decision procedure is a majoritarian or otherwise 'neutral' democracy. If the justification of democracy requires an equality baseline in the design of political regimes and if justifications for departure from this baseline are subject to reasonable disagreement, a majoritarian design is justified by default. Gaus's own preference for super-majoritarian procedures is based on disputable specifications of justified liberal principles. These procedures can only be defended as a sectarian preference if the equality baseline is rejected, but then it is not clear how the set of justifiable political regimes can be restricted to full democracies. KW - public-reason liberalism KW - democracy KW - coercion KW - political equality KW - majority rule KW - Gerald Gaus Y1 - 2013 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X12447786 SN - 1470-594X VL - 12 IS - 2 SP - 179 EP - 196 PB - Sage Publ. CY - Thousand Oaks ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Sorge, Arndt T1 - Disintegrating Democracy at Work: Labor Unions and the Future of Good Jobs in the Service Economy JF - British journal of industrial relations : an international journal of employment relations Y1 - 2013 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306113514539i SN - 0007-1080 VL - 51 IS - 1 PB - Wiley-Blackwell CY - Hoboken ER - TY - THES A1 - Müller, Jochen T1 - Demokratische Responsivität auf regionaler Ebene : eine vergleichende Untersuchung des Entscheidungsverhaltens von Wählern und Parteien in europäischen Mehrebenensystemen Y1 - 2013 CY - Potsdam ER - TY - THES A1 - Ehrentraut, Stefan T1 - Challenging Khmer citizenship : minorities, the state, and the international community in Cambodia T1 - Khmer Staatsbürgerschaft? : Minderheiten, der Staat und die internationale Gemeinschaft in Kambodscha N2 - The idea of a distinctly ‘liberal’ form of multiculturalism has emerged in the theory and practice of Western democracies and the international community has become actively engaged in its global dissemination via international norms and organizations. This thesis investigates the internationalization of minority rights, by exploring state-minority relations in Cambodia, in light of Will Kymlicka’s theory of multicultural citizenship. Based on extensive empirical research, the analysis explores the situation and aspirations of Cambodia’s ethnic Vietnamese, highland peoples, Muslim Cham, ethnic Chinese and Lao and the relationships between these groups and the state. All Cambodian regimes since independence have defined citizenship with reference to the ethnicity of the Khmer majority and have - often violently - enforced this conception through the assimilation of highland peoples and the Cham and the exclusion of ethnic Vietnamese and Chinese. Cambodia’s current constitution, too, defines citizenship ethnically. State-sponsored Khmerization systematically privileges members of the majority culture and marginalizes minority members politically, economically and socially. The thesis investigates various international initiatives aimed at promoting application of minority rights norms in Cambodia. It demonstrates that these initiatives have largely failed to accomplish a greater degree of compliance with international norms in practice. This failure can be explained by a number of factors, among them Cambodia’s neo-patrimonial political system, the geo-political fears of a ‘minoritized’ Khmer majority, the absence of effective regional security institutions, the lack of minority access to political decision-making, the significant differences between international and Cambodian conceptions of modern statehood and citizenship and the emergence of China as Cambodia’s most important bilateral donor and investor. Based on this analysis, the dissertation develops recommendations for a sequenced approach to minority rights promotion, with pragmatic, less ambitious shorter-term measures that work progressively towards achievement of international norms in the longer-term. N2 - In der politischen Theorie und Praxis liberaler Demokratien hat sich die Idee eines explizit liberalen Multikulturalismus etabliert. Die internationale Gemeinschaft verbreitet diese Idee weltweit durch Völkerrechtsnormen und internationale Organisationen. Auf der Grundlage umfangreicher Feldforschung untersucht die vorliegende Dissertation die Internationalisierung von Minderheitenrechten am Beispiel Kambodschas. Dazu werden die Situation und Aspirationen von Kambodschas ethnischen Vietnamesen, Bergvölkern, islamischen Cham, ethnischen Chinesen und Laoten und das Verhältnis zwischen diesen Gruppen und dem Staat analysiert. Alle kambodschanischen Regimes seit der Unabhängigkeit haben Staatsbürgerschaft über die Ethnizität der Khmer Mehrheit definiert und diese Konzeption durch den Versuch der Assimilation der Bergvölker und Cham und den Ausschluss ethnischer Vietnamesen und Chinesen aktiv und oft gewaltsam zu verwirklichen versucht. Auch die aktuelle Verfassung definiert Mitgliedschaft im Gemeinwesen ethnisch. Das Streben des Staates nach der kulturellen ‚Khmerisation‘ der Bevölkerung privilegiert Mehrheitsmitglieder und marginalisiert Mitglieder kultureller Minderheiten politisch, wirtschaftlich und sozial. Trotz vielfältiger Initiativen ist die internationale Gemeinschaft daran gescheitert, in Kambodscha die Anwendung internationaler Minderheitenrechte zu erreichen. Die Analyse erklärt dieses Scheitern mit einer Reihe von Faktoren, darunter Kambodschas neo-patrimonialem Regierungssystem, den geo-politischen Ängsten einer ‚minoritisierten’ Khmer Mehrheit, dem Fehlen effektiver regionaler Sicherheitsinstitutionen, dem fehlenden Zugang von Minderheiten zu politischen Entscheidungsprozessen, den erheblichen Unterschieden zwischen internationalen und kambodschanischen Konzeptionen von moderner Staatlichkeit und Staatsbürgerschaft sowie der zunehmenden Bedeutung Chinas als Kambodschas wichtigstem bilateraler Geber und Investor. Auf der Grundlage dieser Analyse entwickelt die Arbeit Empfehlungen, wie die internationale Gemeinschaft mit einem sequenzierten Ansatz die schrittweise Annäherung an internationale Normen und deren langfristige Einhaltung erreichen kann. KW - Kambodscha KW - Minderheiten KW - indigene Völker KW - Dezentralisierung KW - Vietnamesen KW - Cambodia KW - minorities KW - indigenous peoples KW - decentralization KW - Vietnamese Y1 - 2013 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-70355 ER -