TY  - JOUR
A1  - Beisheim, Marianne
A1  - Liese, Andrea Margit
A1  - Lorch, Jasmin
T1  - Introduction : transnationale partnerships for sustainable development
Y1  - 2014
SN  - 978-1-137-35925-0
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Beisheim, Marianne
A1  - Liese, Andrea Margit
A1  - Vosseler, Christian
T1  - Who governs partnershis? on the role board, donors, partners and other stakeholders
Y1  - 2014
SN  - 978-1-137-35925-0
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Bernhard, Stefan
A1  - Schmidt-Wellenburg, Christian
T1  - Einleitung
Y1  - 2012
SN  - 978-3-531-17871-4
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Bernhard, Stefan
A1  - Schmidt-Wellenburg, Christian
ED  - Schmidt-Wellenburg, Christian
T1  - Feldanalyse als Forschungsprogramm
Y1  - 2012
SN  - 978-3-531-17871-4
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Bernhard, Stefan
A1  - Schmidt-Wellenburg, Christian
T1  - Einleitung
Y1  - 2012
SN  - 978-3-531-18018-2
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Bobzien, Licia
A1  - Kalleitner, Fabian
T1  - Attitudes towards European financial solidarity during the Covid-19 pandemic
BT  - evidence from a net-contributor country
JF  - European societies
N2  - Whilst the Covid-19 pandemic affects all European countries, the ways in which these countries are prepared for the health and subsequent economic crisis varies considerably. Financial solidarity within the European Union (EU) could mitigate some of these inequalities but depends upon the support of the citizens of individual member states for such policies. This paper studies attitudes of the Austrian population - a net-contributor to the European budget - towards financial solidarity using two waves of the Austrian Corona Panel Project collected in May and June 2020. We find that individuals (i) who are less likely to consider the Covid-19 pandemic as a national economic threat, (ii) who believe that Austria benefits from supporting other countries, and (iii) who prefer the crisis to be organized more centrally at EU-level show higher support for European financial solidarity. Using fixed effects models, we further show that perceiving economic threats and preferring central crisis management also explain attitude dynamics within individuals over time. We conclude that cost-benefit perceptions are important determinants for individual support of European financial solidarity during the Covid-19 pandemic.
KW  - Covid-19
KW  - financial solidarity
KW  - European Union
KW  - Austria
Y1  - 2020
U6  - https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1836669
SN  - 1461-6696
SN  - 1469-8307
VL  - 23
IS  - Sup. 1
SP  - S791
EP  - S804
PB  - Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
CY  - Abingdon
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Bogumil, Jörg
A1  - Kuhlmann, Sabine
T1  - Wirkungen lokaler Verwaltungsreformen : Möglichkeiten und Probleme der Performanzevaluation
Y1  - 2006
SN  - 3-89404-776-3
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Bonomi Savignon, Andrea
A1  - Meneguzzo, Marco
A1  - Kuhlmann, Sabine
A1  - Cepiku, Denita
T1  - Guest editorial: Interinstitutional performance management
BT  - theory and practice of performance indicators at organizational boundaries
JF  - International journal of public sector management : IJPSM
Y1  - 2021
U6  - https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-03-2021-0057
SN  - 0951-3558
SN  - 1758-6666
VL  - 34
IS  - 3
SP  - 241
EP  - 246
PB  - Emerald Group Publishing Limited
CY  - Bingley
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Borck, Rainald
A1  - Wimbersky, Martin
T1  - Political economics of higher education finance
JF  - Oxford economic papers
Y1  - 2014
U6  - https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gps042
SN  - 0030-7653
SN  - 1464-3812
VL  - 66
IS  - 1
SP  - 115
EP  - 139
PB  - Oxford Univ. Press
CY  - Oxford
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Borgnäs, Kajsa
T1  - The Policy Influence of Sustainability Indicators: Examining Use and Influence of Indicators in German Sustainability Policy Making
JF  - German politics
N2  - In 2002 Germany adopted an ambitious national sustainability strategy, covering all three sustainability spheres and circling around 21 key indicators. The strategy stands out because of its relative stability over five consecutive government constellations, its high status and increasingly coercive nature. This article analyses the strategy's role in the policy process, focusing on the use and influence of indicators as a central steering tool. Contrasting rationalist and constructivist perspectives on the role of knowledge in policy, two factors, namely the level of consensus about policy goals and the institutional setting of the indicators, are found to explain differences in use and influence both across indicators and over time. Moreover, the study argues that the indicators have been part of a continuous process of ‘structuring’ in which conceptual and instrumental use together help structure the sustainability challenge in such a way that it becomes more manageable for government policy.
Y1  - 2016
U6  - https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2016.1193160
SN  - 0964-4008
SN  - 1743-8993
VL  - 25
SP  - 480
EP  - 499
PB  - Elsevier
CY  - Abingdon
ER  -