TY - JOUR A1 - Gebser, Martin A1 - Kaminski, Roland A1 - Kaufmann, Benjamin A1 - Lühne, Patrick A1 - Obermeier, Philipp A1 - Ostrowski, Max A1 - Romero Davila, Javier A1 - Schaub, Torsten H. A1 - Schellhorn, Sebastian A1 - Wanko, Philipp T1 - The Potsdam Answer Set Solving Collection 5.0 JF - Künstliche Intelligenz N2 - The Potsdam answer set solving collection, or Potassco for short, bundles various tools implementing and/or applying answer set programming. The article at hand succeeds an earlier description of the Potassco project published in Gebser et al. (AI Commun 24(2):107-124, 2011). Hence, we concentrate in what follows on the major features of the most recent, fifth generation of the ASP system clingo and highlight some recent resulting application systems. Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-018-0528-x SN - 0933-1875 SN - 1610-1987 VL - 32 IS - 2-3 SP - 181 EP - 182 PB - Springer CY - Heidelberg ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Haubelt, Christian A1 - Neubauer, Kai A1 - Schaub, Torsten H. A1 - Wanko, Philipp T1 - Design space exploration with answer set programming JF - Künstliche Intelligenz N2 - The aim of our project design space exploration with answer set programming is to develop a general framework based on Answer Set Programming (ASP) that finds valid solutions to the system design problem and simultaneously performs Design Space Exploration (DSE) to find the most favorable alternatives. We leverage recent developments in ASP solving that allow for tight integration of background theories to create a holistic framework for effective DSE. Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-018-0530-3 SN - 0933-1875 SN - 1610-1987 VL - 32 IS - 2-3 SP - 205 EP - 206 PB - Springer CY - Heidelberg ER - TY - GEN A1 - Neubauer, Kai A1 - Haubelt, Christian A1 - Wanko, Philipp A1 - Schaub, Torsten H. T1 - Utilizing quad-trees for efficient design space exploration with partial assignment evaluation T2 - 2018 23rd Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC) N2 - Recently, it has been shown that constraint-based symbolic solving techniques offer an efficient way for deciding binding and routing options in order to obtain a feasible system level implementation. In combination with various background theories, a feasibility analysis of the resulting system may already be performed on partial solutions. That is, infeasible subsets of mapping and routing options can be pruned early in the decision process, which fastens the solving accordingly. However, allowing a proper design space exploration including multi-objective optimization also requires an efficient structure for storing and managing non-dominated solutions. In this work, we propose and study the usage of the Quad-Tree data structure in the context of partial assignment evaluation during system synthesis. Out experiments show that unnecessary dominance checks can be avoided, which indicates a preference of Quad-Trees over a commonly used list-based implementation for large combinatorial optimization problems. Y1 - 2018 SN - 978-1-5090-0602-1 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1109/ASPDAC.2018.8297362 SN - 2153-6961 SP - 434 EP - 439 PB - IEEE CY - New York ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Banbara, Mutsunori A1 - Inoue, Katsumi A1 - Kaufmann, Benjamin A1 - Okimoto, Tenda A1 - Schaub, Torsten H. A1 - Soh, Takehide A1 - Tamura, Naoyuki A1 - Wanko, Philipp T1 - teaspoon BT - solving the curriculum-based course timetabling problems with answer set programming JF - Annals of operation research N2 - Answer Set Programming (ASP) is an approach to declarative problem solving, combining a rich yet simple modeling language with high performance solving capacities. We here develop an ASP-based approach to curriculum-based course timetabling (CB-CTT), one of the most widely studied course timetabling problems. The resulting teaspoon system reads a CB-CTT instance of a standard input format and converts it into a set of ASP facts. In turn, these facts are combined with a first-order encoding for CB-CTT solving, which can subsequently be solved by any off-the-shelf ASP systems. We establish the competitiveness of our approach by empirically contrasting it to the best known bounds obtained so far via dedicated implementations. Furthermore, we extend the teaspoon system to multi-objective course timetabling and consider minimal perturbation problems. KW - Educational timetabling KW - Course timetabling KW - Answer set programming KW - Multi-objective optimization KW - Minimal perturbation problems Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2757-7 SN - 0254-5330 SN - 1572-9338 VL - 275 IS - 1 SP - 3 EP - 37 PB - Springer CY - Dordrecht ER -